Which one is the most preferred anesthesia type in dental treatments of patients with special needs: sedation or general anesthesia?

Author:

ERDOĞAN Elif1,ÇAKMAK Yusuf1,ÖKSÜZ Murat1,TEKİN Selda1,BAKAN Nurten1

Affiliation:

1. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL SANCAKTEPE ŞEHİR PROF. DR. İLHAN VARANK SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ

Abstract

Aim: Patients with special needs, who have mental, physical or medical disabilities, were reported to have worse oral hygiene than their healthy peers. Disabled patients are usually uncooperated, and dental treatments of these patients are completed under several anesthesia types. Our aim was to compare anesthesia types in dental treatments of patients with special needs. Material and Method: The study included review of uncooperated patients, who had physical or mental disabilities, between June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022. Patients were divided into three groups due to their anesthesia types; sedation (Group S), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (Group L), and nasotracheal intubation (Group N). Results: In total 80 patients were analyzed; 4 patients excluded, 45 patients were in Group S, 19 patients were in Group L, and 12 patients were in Group N. Anesthesia times were significantly different between groups; 20 min in Group S, 25 min in Group L, and 45 min in Group N. Propofol use was significantly low (p<0.001) and ketamine use was significantly high in Group S (p=0.002). Number of tooth extractions was not significantly different between groups, but number of filling tooth was significantly high in Group N (p=0.002). Conclusion: Sedation was the most preferred anesthesia type in dental treatment of patients with special needs. Although all three types of anesthesia can be used safely in dental treatments, we suggest that sedation can be considered as the first choice in tooth extraction in patients deemed appropriate by the anesthesiologist and dentist.

Publisher

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3