Affiliation:
1. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL OKMEYDANI SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ
2. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ŞİŞLİ HAMİDİYE ETFAL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER
Abstract
Aim: Determining the relationship between clinical and pathological features in endometrial cancer is essential for both prognostic and potential therapeutic benefits. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between pelvic and paraaortic lymph node (PLN and PALN) metastasis and prognostic factors in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).Material and Method: Medical records of patients who underwent primary surgery for EC in our gynecological oncology center between the 2016 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The relationship between pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis was evaluated with data such as patient age, body mass index, serum CA 125 level, macroscopic tumor diameter, and patients’ risk groups.Results: Fifty-seven patients with EC were evaluated. Lymph node involvement was detected in 10 patients (17.5%). Acording to Modiffied Mayo criterias ; the patients with grade 3 EC had a higher risk of metastasis compared to other grades (p=0.025). Patients with lymph node metastases had a greater depth of invasion (p=0.001). There was no relationship between tumor size and lymph node metastasis (p=0.494). In the logistic regression analysis, the depth of invasion was found to be an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis. There was no significant relationship between the presence of PLN and PALN metastases in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, but the presence of PALN metastasis was significant in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with PLN metastasis (p=0.002).Conclusion: These findings support the idea that routine evaluation of tumor invasion depth during endometrial cancer surgery may be useful in predicting lymph node metastasis and guiding the operation.
Publisher
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Braun MM, Overbeek-Wager EA, Grumbo RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician 2016; 15: 93: 468-74.
2. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Kanser İstatistikleri 2017. Available online: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/istatistik/Turkiye_Kanser_Istatistikleri_2017.pdf
3. Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Medel NIB, et al. Comparative performance of the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics’ staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1141-9.
4. Akbayir O, Corbacioglu A, Goksedef BP, et al. The novel criteria for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 400–403.
5. Sarı ME, Meydanlı ME, Yalçın İ, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis among lymphovascular space ınvasion-positive women with endometrioid endometrial cancer clinically confi ned to the uterus. Oncol Res Treat 2018; 41: 750-4.