Systemic approach to the choice of optical methods of forensic examination of micro-objects

Author:

Havryliuk Liudmyla1ORCID,Drozd Valentyna2ORCID,Nenia Olena3ORCID,Kyslyi Anatolii4ORCID,Niebytov Andrii5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministry Activities of State Research Institute of the MIA of Ukraine

2. Department of Research Laboratory of Problems of Legal and Organizational Support of the Ministry Activities of State Research Institute of the MIA of Ukraine

3. State Research Institute of the MIA of Ukraine

4. Scientific Law Institute named after the Prince Vladimir the Great of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

5. Main Department of the National Police in the Kiev region

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze theoretical and methodological provisions related to the definition of directions and principles of implementation of a systematic approach to the use of optical research methods, in particular micro-objects. Subject of research is substantiation and formulation of the classification characteristics of such systematic approach, considering the requirements of forensic techniques. Methodology: The study applies such methods of scientific knowledge as dialectical method, system and structural method, logic and legal method, methods of systematic analysis, logical method. Research results: The article studies the problematic issues of a systematic approach to the choice of scientific and technical methods and means for micro-object examination. Practical consequences: The authors argue that optical methods of the micro-object examination require classifying and systematizing to provide a holistic view of their potentials, as well as the nature of the information that can be obtained about the object being examined. Value / originality: The analysis of clarified classification characteristics and requirements for examination methods in forensic science enables to propose the algorithm of the systemic approach to the creation of the open system classification of methods of micro-object examination and to make justified conclusions.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference33 articles.

1. AVERIANOVA, Tatiana, et al. 2001. Criminalistics. NORMA. Moscow. Available online. In: http://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI/BELKIN_KRIM_2001.htm. Date of consultation: 10/09/2020.

2. CLARKE, Ashley; EBERHARD, Colin 2002. “Microscopy Techniques for Materials Science” In: Woodhead Publishing, CRC Press. Cambridge, England.

3. DAVYDOVA, Olena. 2008. Forensic examinations of materials, substances and products. KNT. Kyiv, Ukraine.

4. HEL, Pavlo, et al. 1998. “Laboratory workshop on physics. Part 2: Oscillations and waves, optics” In: Vinnytsia State Technical University. Vinnytsia, Ukraine.

5. HONCHARENKO, Vladlen. 2011. “Selected works” In: Precedent. Kyiv. Available online. In: http://e-books.aau.edu.ua/assets/books/Goncharenko-selected-works.pdf. Date of consultation: 10/09/2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3