Current Trends in the Development of International Terrorism: A Current Understanding of the Problem

Author:

Svoboda Ivo1ORCID,Loskutov Tymur O.2ORCID,Severinova Oleksandra B.3ORCID,Peresada Olha M.4ORCID,Shulha Andriy O.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Guarantor of Security Management Studies, Ambis - Vysoká škola, Praha, Czech Republic

2. Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

3. Faculty #3, Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

4. Faculty #3, Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Mariupol, Ukraine

5. Department of State and Legal Disciplines and Public Administration, Faculty #3, Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Mariupol, Ukraine

Abstract

The study examines the development of international terrorism and the problem of its definition. Consequently, the objective of the study was to generate a systemic view of international terrorism and to identify current trends in its development. A structural and functional analysis of international terrorism as a political phenomenon was used. Based on the analytical model provided, the development of international terrorism was divided into periods based on political and geographical zoning. Three consistent principles determine the key characteristics of international terrorism as a rational strategy of unconventional political struggle: the transition to asymmetrical actions, attacks on symbolic objects, and influencing public opinion as the main objective. This triality of characteristics linked to a model of the political process defines the existence of international terrorism as a phenomenon and provides a key to understanding its dynamics. It is concluded that there are four periods in the development of international terrorism, divided into two cycles with breaking points, ascending, and descending phases. The proposed periodization of the development of international terrorism is based on the identification of the centers as political-geographical areas, where contradictions are configured and the political struggle that is part of the logic of the terrorist strategy.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference50 articles.

1. AMBROZIK, Caitlin. 2018. “To change or not to change? The effect of terminology on public support of countering violent extremism efforts” In: Democracy and Security. Vol. 14, No.1, 45-67.

2. ANDERSON, Eric C. 2015. "Confusing a “Revolution” with “Terrorism”. Available online. In: https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/confusing-a-%e2%80%9crevolution%e2%80%9d-with-%e2%80%9cterrorism%e2%80%9d. Date of consultation: 20/01/2021.

3. ARAN, Gideon. 2019. “Striking home: ideal-type of terrorism” In: Terrorism and Political Violence. Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 987-1005.

4. ASHOUR, Omar. 2020. “From Bullets to Ballots. Transformations from Armed to Unarmed Political Activism. Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies”. Available online. In: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25870 Date of consultation: 20/05/2021.

5. AUGER, Vincent A. 2020. “Right-wing terror: A fifth global wave?” In: Perspectives on Terrorism. Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 87-97.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3