Affiliation:
1. Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Faculty of Law
2. Professor of the Department of foreign languages, Institute of International Relations
3. St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions (Russian Federation)
Abstract
The research analyzes different models of marginality in historical-legal and political-legal contexts. The relevance of the study is due to the significant risks of spreading marginality in modern society, as a prerequisite for legal anomia. Understanding marginality, as one of the destructive forms of legal awareness and legally significant limiting behavior, allows marginality to be modeled historically and theoretically in relation to sociocultural phenomena such as state and law. At the methodological level, documentary design was used close to historical research and epistemological reflection typical of interdisciplinary dialogue. It is concluded that the use of legal means and techniques to combat marginality is based on the hypothesis of legal consciousness, according to which anyone initially focuses on consciousness, socially active and useful, and therefore on lawful behavior established by law. This approach can be formed, strengthened, or restored through the implementation of educational, ideological, and other functions of law, political science, or history.
Publisher
Cuestiones Politicas, Universidad del Zulia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference16 articles.
1. AINOUTDINOVA, Karina A ; AINOUTDINOVA, Irina N. 2019. “Deviant behaviors among young people as a result of inadequate parental attachment / Karina A. Ainoutdinova, Irina N. Ainoutdinova” In: The IIOAB Journal (IIOABJ), Issue: Multidisciplinary Social Science & Management. Vol. 10, No. S1, pp. 168-171 (In Russian).
2. ATOYAN, Armen I. 1993. “Social marginalism on the premises of a new interdisciplinary and cultural-historical synthesis” In: Political studies. No. 6, pp. 29-38.
3. BAKULINA, Liliya T. 2014. “The Roman spirit" of the code of Napoleon” In: Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 5, No. 24, pp. 477-479.
4. BILLSON, Janet Mancini. 1988. “No owner of soil. The concept of marginality revisited on its sixtieth birthday” In: New Delhi: International Review of Modern Sociology. Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 183-204.
5. BRADATAN, Costica; CRAIUTU, Aurelian. 2012. “Introduction: The Paradoxes of Marginality / Costica Bradatan, Aurelian Craiutu” In; The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms. Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 721-729.