Human rights during the mass introduction of artificial intelligence and robotic systems into public life-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Human rights during the mass introduction of artificial intelligence and robotic systems into public life

Published:2021-12-25 Issue:71 Volume:39 Page:609-620
ISSN:2542-3185
Container-title:Cuestiones Políticas
language:es
Short-container-title:Cuest. Pol.

Author:

Kuteynikov Dmitry¹^ORCID,Izhaev Osman¹^ORCID,Lebedev Valerian¹^ORCID,Zenin Sergey²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow, Russia

2. Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia; Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Abstract

Purpose: This article considers legal approaches to implementing human rights during the mass exploitation of artificial intelligence and robotic systems in public life. Methods: Within the framework of this study, an emphasis is placed on the legal regulation of artificial intelligence systems and robotics used for remote biometric identification of a person and the creation of social credit systems. This study analyzes different models of legal regulation that are typical of certain countries and regions, including the UK, USA, China, and the EU. Results: In the UK, it is allowed to use real-time face recognition systems in public spaces but the set of scenarios and situations for their use is significantly limited by legislation and law enforcement. The legal regulation of these systems in each state is based on a constant dialogue between state and civil society. The use of artificial intelligence and robotic systems to create social credit systems is tested in some countries. Modern states have formed several approaches to the creation of such systems: some of them completely prohibit these systems, while others develop a technological and regulatory framework for the creation of national systems.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference18 articles.

1. BIOMETRICS AND FORENSICS ETHICS GROUP. 2021. Briefing note on the ethical issues arising from public–private collaboration in the use of live facial recognition technology (accessible). GOV.UK. Available online. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-private-use-of-live-facial-recognition-technology-ethical-issues/briefing-note-on-the-ethical-issues-arising-from-public-private-collaboration-in-the-use-of-live-facial-recognition-technology-accessible. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

2. CENTRE FOR DATA ETHICS AND INNOVATION. 2020. Independent report Snapshot Paper – Facial Recognition Technology. GOV.UK. Available online. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cdei-publishes-briefing-paper-on-facial-recognition-technology/snapshot-paper-facial-recognition-technology. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

3. EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION BOARD. 2021. EDPB & EDPS call for ban on use of AI for automated recognition of human features in publicly accessible spaces, and some other uses of AI that can lead to unfair discrimination. edpb.europa.eu. Available online. In: https://edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2021/edpb-edps-call-ban-use-ai-automated-recognition-human-features-publicly-accessible_en. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

4. FEINER, Lauren; PALMER, Annie. 2021. Rules around facial recognition and policing remain blurry. CNBC. Available online. In: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/12/a-year-later-tech-companies-calls-to-regulate-facial-recognition-met-with-little-progress.html. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

5. GORDON, Barrie. 2021. “Automated facial recognition in law enforcement: the Queen (on application of Edward Bridges) v the chief constable of South Wales Police” In: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. Vol. 24, pp. 1-29.