International Experience in Assessing the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Agencies in Crime Prevention

Author:

Halunko Vira1ORCID,Shkuta Oleh1,Predmestnikov Oleh1ORCID,Petrenko Nataliia2ORCID,Holenko Nina3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Professional and Special Disciplines of Kherson Faculty, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Kherson, Ukraine

2. Department of Professional and Special Disciplines of Kherson Faculty, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Kherson, Ukraine

3. Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Kherson, Ukraine

Abstract

The objective of the investigation was to analyze some international experience in assessing the effectiveness of law enforcement in crime prevention. Methodologically, the dialectic method, typical of materialistic philosophy, was combined with scientific techniques of cognition. It is concluded that the basis for assessing the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in different countries is based on a set of quantitative and qualitative criteria; sometimes such criteria conflict with each other, as some are beneficial for bureaucratic reporting, while others reflect the public's interests. Public opinion, as one of the main criteria, is becoming increasingly important in assessing the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in some countries (e.g., the Slovak Republic), and in the US, France, Japan, Austria, and Italy, it is a traditional evaluation tool. Ambiguous is the use of statistics to assess the effectiveness of law enforcement in certain countries and Finally, there are countries where criminal statistics are a priority to determine the effectiveness of law enforcement and in others not.

Publisher

Cuestiones Politicas, Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference18 articles.

1. ANDRIICHENKO, Nadiia. 2018. “Step forward improvement of police performance assessment as a subject of combating financial and economic crimes: experience of Ukraine and Slovakia” In: Bratislava Law Review. Vol. 2, No, 2, pp. 127-136.

2. BUHAICHUK, Kostiantyn. 2015. Criteria for assessing the work of police bodies of individual countries. Available online. In: http://police-reform.khpg.org/articles/kriteriyi_ocinki_roboti_organiv_policiyi_okremih_krayin n. Consultation date: 08/09/2019 (In Ukrainian).

3. CALEA. n.d. The Gold Standard in Public Safety. Available online. In: https://calea.org/es. Consultation date: 08/09/2019.

4. DAVIS, Robert C. 2012. Selected International Best Practices in Police Performance Measurement. Available online. In: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt1q60z7. Consultation date: 08/09/2019.

5. ETERNO, John A.; SILVERMAN, Eli B. 2012. The crime numbers game. Management by Manipulation. CRC Press. New York, USA.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3