Affiliation:
1. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
Abstract
The article addresses the qualification problems of armed conflicts. The study was conducted through the analysis of international legal doctrine, international treaties, decisions of international organizations. Attention is paid to the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court. It is noted that International Humanitarian Law has been in place since the beginning of the armed conflict. Therefore, the application of International Humanitarian Law does not require any recognition of the existence of armed conflict (international or non-international); this conflict exists because of armed clashes. It is emphasized that the need to classify the conflict arises in view of domestic and international legal factors (to bring to international criminal justice those who have committed war crimes; state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts, etc.). Attention was paid to the non-existence of a single body, which was empowered to determine the existence of an armed conflict. Different international agencies may have different qualifications for the same armed conflict. It is concluded that it is necessary to establish a Committee of Experts under the UN Secretary-General, to avoid different qualifications from the same armed conflict.
Publisher
Cuestiones Politicas, Universidad del Zulia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference67 articles.
1. AKSAR, Yusuf. 2004. Implementing International Humanitarian Law: From the Ad Hoc Tribunals to a Permanent International Criminal Court. Routledge. London and New York.
2. ANTONYUK, Natalya; MALSKYY, Markiyan. 2016. “Russia’s Hybrid Warfare against Ukraine in the context Of European Security” In: Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series International Relations. No. 38, pp 23–42.
3. ARAKELIAN, Minas; BEKHRUZ, Khashmatulla; YAROVA, Liliana.2020. “Prohibited means and methods of armed conflicts” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 26, pp. 349-355.
4. ARMSTRONG, John A. 1968. “A. Collaborationism in World War II: The Integral Nationalist Variant in Eastern Europe” Journal of Modern History. Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 396-410.
5. BERNARD, Vincent. 2014. “Delineating the boundaries of violence” In: International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 96, No. 893, pp 5–11.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献