Affiliation:
1. Rostov state University of railway engineering
2. Northern Caucasian branch of the «Russian state University of justice»
3. Kuban state University
4. Belgorod State University
5. Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Abstract
The modern principles of judiciary, being an integrative constitutional-theoretical category, are the object of scientific research from the point of view of a meaningful interpretation, as well as the specific nature of formalization, including its the comparative legal aspect. In this regard, the research subject of this article is represented by the norms of the constitutions of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The article presents the analysis results, which allowed us identifying the non-standard approaches to consolidate the constitutional principles of the judiciary in the focus group of acts. We associate these approaches with the compositional specific nature of principle reflection, as well as with the variably-substantive aspect, which quantitatively and qualitatively supplements the standard list of required fundamental ideas.
Publisher
Cuestiones Politicas, Universidad del Zulia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference14 articles.
1. 1. AKBARZADEH, Shahram. 1996. “Nation‐building in Uzbekistan” In: Central Asian Survey. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939608400931. Date of consultation: 03/04/2019.
2. 2. BEYER, Judith. 2015. “Constitutional faith law and hope in revolutionary Kyrgyzstan” In: Ethnos. Available online. In: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00141844.2013.841270?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=retn20. Date of consultation: 06/04/2019.
3. 3. DAVE, B. 2007. “Kazakhstan. Nations in Transit” Available online. In: http://www. freedomhouse. hu/images/fdh_galleries/NIT2007/nt-kazakhstan. pdf. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.
4. 4. KHABRIEVA, T. Y. 2018. Constitutional Modernization in the CIS Countries: New Trends. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Available online. In: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1019331618010033. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.
5. 5. GRIBNAU, Halin. 2002. Legitimacy of the Judiciary. In: E. Hondius and C. Joustra (red.) Netherlands Reports to the Sixteenth International Congress of Comparative Law, Antwerpen [etc.]: Intersentia, pp. 25-45.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献