Constitutional Principles Of Judiciary: Peculiarities Of Formalization In The Cis Countries

Author:

Treskov Aleksej P.1,But'ko Lyudmila V.2,Dzidzoev Ruslan M.3,Novikova Alevtina E.4,Solovyev Andrey A.5

Affiliation:

1. Rostov state University of railway engineering

2. Northern Caucasian branch of the «Russian state University of justice»

3. Kuban state University

4. Belgorod State University

5. Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Abstract

The modern principles of judiciary, being an integrative constitutional-theoretical category, are the object of scientific research from the point of view of a meaningful interpretation, as well as the specific nature of formalization, including its the comparative legal aspect. In this regard, the research subject of this article is represented by the norms of the constitutions of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The article presents the analysis results, which allowed us identifying the non-standard approaches to consolidate the constitutional principles of the judiciary in the focus group of acts. We associate these approaches with the compositional specific nature of principle reflection, as well as with the variably-substantive aspect, which quantitatively and qualitatively supplements the standard list of required fundamental ideas.

Publisher

Cuestiones Politicas, Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference14 articles.

1. 1. AKBARZADEH, Shahram. 1996. “Nation‐building in Uzbekistan” In: Central Asian Survey. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939608400931. Date of consultation: 03/04/2019.

2. 2. BEYER, Judith. 2015. “Constitutional faith law and hope in revolutionary Kyrgyzstan” In: Ethnos. Available online. In: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00141844.2013.841270?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=retn20. Date of consultation: 06/04/2019.

3. 3. DAVE, B. 2007. “Kazakhstan. Nations in Transit” Available online. In: http://www. freedomhouse. hu/images/fdh_galleries/NIT2007/nt-kazakhstan. pdf. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.

4. 4. KHABRIEVA, T. Y. 2018. Constitutional Modernization in the CIS Countries: New Trends. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Available online. In: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1019331618010033. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.

5. 5. GRIBNAU, Halin. 2002. Legitimacy of the Judiciary. In: E. Hondius and C. Joustra (red.) Netherlands Reports to the Sixteenth International Congress of Comparative Law, Antwerpen [etc.]: Intersentia, pp. 25-45.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3