Regulation of advocacy profession: global trends

Author:

Vilchyk Tetiana1ORCID,Sokolova Alla1ORCID,Demchyna Tetiana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

Abstract

The objective of the article is to analyze the regulation of the legal profession and its global trends. There are many different types of regulators globally, and many different sources and methods of regulation. There is no simple approach to setting goals for regulating the legal profession in different legal systems. Although self-regulation of the legal profession is considered the basis for adhering to the standard of its independence, at the same time, academics recognize the existence of the theory of the management of the legal profession. To study these problems, the authors conducted a comparative study of the regulatory models of the legal profession in the world in terms of compliance with international standards of legal independence in different legal jurisdictions and made some suggestions to improve the legal regulation of the legal profession in Ukraine. Empirical sources for scientific research were international documents, court decisions, national legislation of Great Britain, Canada, the United States, Ireland, Scotland, Australia and others, and the work of scientists. The article uses general scientific methods - dialectic, analysis, synthesis, analogy, etc., and special methods, particularly legal, historical, and formal comparative law.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference20 articles.

1. BAKAIANOVA, Nana; SVYDA, Oleksii; DEMENCHUK, Maryna; DZHABURIYA, Olena; FOMINA, Oksana. 2019. "Advocacy of Ukraine under constitutional reform" In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 22, pp. 574-579.

2. BROMWICH, Rebecca. 2018. "(Where Is) the Tipping Point for Governmental Regulation of Canadian Lawyers: Perhaps It Is in Paradise: Critically Assessing Regulation of Lawyer Involvement with Money Laundering After Canada-Attorney General-v Federation of Law Societies of Canada" In: Man. LJ. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 11-26.

3. BODRUNOVA, Svetlana S. 2021. "Information disorder practices in/by contemporary Russia" In: The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. Routledge. Vol. 123, pp. 279-289.

4. CONE III, Sydney M. 2007. "International Legal Practice Involving England and New York Following Adoption of the United Kingdom Legal Services Act of 2007." Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. Vol. 28, pp. 400-415.

5. DJABURIA, Elena. 2019. "Organizational forms of advocacy related to the creation of a legal entity: some problem aspects" In: Jurnalul juridic national: teorie şi practică, Vol. 36, No. 2-1, pp. 59-62.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3