Affiliation:
1. Poltava State Medical University (Poltava, Ukraine) Lecturer at the Department of Philosophy and social sciences.
2. Poltava State Medical University (Poltava, Ukraine) Candidate of Sciences in History, lecturer at Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences.
3. Higher educational establishment of Ukoopspilka “Poltava University of Economics and Trade” Head of the Department of Law.
4. Poltava State Medical University (Poltava, Ukraine) Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, lecturer at Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences.
Abstract
The dispute resolution approach, which transfers a conflict to the jurisdictional authorities for examination, is losing its relevance nowadays. The study presents the analysis of the practice related to the resolution of conflicts arising in the field of application of reproductive technologies through mediation. The authors have analyzed statistical data, judicial practice, surveys on the use of reproductive technologies. The advantages of resorting to mediation in the field of reproductive technologies are speed, lower cost, lack of formalism, simpler procedure for resolving this type of conflicts, application at the discretion of the participants, guarantee of full confidentiality, objectivity of conflict resolution with the participation of a neutral third party, taking into account the best interests of the child. The mediation agreement is also an independent segment of civil law and cannot be identified with a settlement agreement, but only be the basis for its adoption already in court proceedings. In conclusion, comparing the disadvantages and advantages of the use of mediation in the field of reproductive technologies, it can be stated that the latter significantly prevail.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference27 articles.
1. ALEXANDER, Nadja; CLARE, Samantha; RYCE, Lee. 2021.What's happening in International Mediationin 2021. Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy. Available online. In: https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/sites/sidra.smu.edu.sg/files/survey/84/index.html. Consultation date: 11/11/2022.
2. BORTNYK, Nadiya; TYLCHYK, Olha; GALINA, Lukyanova; SKOCHYLIAS-PAVLIV, Olha; REMENІAK, Olesіa. 2021. “Principles of mediation as an alternative way to protect human and citizen rights” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 70, pp. 238-249.
3. CHIANGA, Wan-Tsui; CHOUB, Tan-Yi. 2018. “A survey of judicial decisions concerning surrogacy disputes in Taiwan” In: International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. Vol. 57, No. 4.
4. CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2004. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). No. 40-41, pp. 42.
5. DONTSOV, Denys; NEUGОDNIKOV, Andryi; BIGNYAK, Oleksandr; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; PANOVA, Lyudmyla. 2021. “Online mediation due to the quarantine caused by COVID-19 Pandemic” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 68, pp. 914-926.