Automated system of court enforcement proceedings as element of information provision for compulsory enforcement of decisions

Author:

Sergiienko Nataliia1ORCID,Suslin Serhii1ORCID,Pyrohovska Vira2ORCID,Serha Volodymyr3ORCID,Ihor Kotovych4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Legal Disciplines National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

2. Department of Philosophy and International communication National University of Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kyiv, Ukraine.

3. Lawyer, Joint Stock Company "National Joint Stock Company "Naftogaz of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine.

4. Associate Professor of the Department of Private Law, State tax university, Irpin, Ukraine.

Abstract

The aim of the article was to suggest ways to improve the legislation regulating the scope of operation of the automated system of judicial enforcement proceedings, in order to increase the effectiveness of enforced execution of decisions while respecting human rights. The methodology of the article was based on the application of the following methods of scientific cognition: analytical, deductive, hermeneutic, comparative and synthesis. In addition, the authors analyze the legal regulation of the operation of the automated system of execution of court judgments, as an element of information provision for the forced execution of resolutions and, at the same time, have revealed the gaps in its legal regulation and, consequently, have suggested the ways to eliminate them. It was definitely established that there was no need to amend the legislation concerning the distribution of enforcement documents among private enforcement officers within their districts of jurisdiction. In the conclusions it was offered to improve certain provisions of the Ukrainian legislation regulating the provision of information on compulsory enforcement of decisions, in particular, to give the prosecutor access to information on judicial enforcement proceedings on an equal footing with the parties.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference23 articles.

1. CHERNYSH, Roman; PROZOROV, Andrii; TYTARENKO, Yaroslav; MATSIUK, Vitalii; LEBEDEV, Olexander. 2022. “Legal and organizational aspects of destructive information impact counteracting: the experience of Ukraine and the European Union” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 169-177.

2. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE. 1997. October 30, Decision No. 5-zp, based on the constitutional submission of the Articles 3, 23, 31, 47, 48 of the Law of Ukraine “On Information” and the Art. 12 of the Law of Ukraine “On Prosecutor’s Office” (case of K.H. Ustymenko). Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-97#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

3. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE. 2012. Decision No. 2-rts/2012 1-9/2012, case based on the constitutional submission of Zhashkiv District Council of Cherkasy Region regarding the official interpretation of the provisions of Part 1 and Part 2 of the Art. 32, Parts 2 and 3 of the Art. 34 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-12#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

4. DATA PROTECTION ACT. 2018. Available online. In: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/3. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

5. DIDENKO, Larysa; SPASOVA, Ekaterina; MYKHAILOVA, Iryna; TSERKOVNA, Olena, YARMAKI, Volodymyr. 2022. “Peculiarities of personal data protection according to European and Ukrainian legislation” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 74, pp. 585-606.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3