Legal procedure in roman law and its reflection in modern civil procedure

Author:

Serhij Kravtsov1ORCID,Serhii Vlasenko2ORCID,Oleh Rozhnov3ORCID,Malinovska Iryna4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Procedure, Yaroslav the Wise National Law University, Ukraine

2. Department of Legal History, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

3. Department Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Kharkiv, Ukraine

4. National Law University Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Tremendous efforts of legislators are directed towards the development of an ideal judicial system and procedure of administering justice. However, current trends of judiciary reformation are easier to comprehend and accept if we turn to the origins of legal protection of human rights which, undoubtedly, go back to the Roman law. Methodology: From this point we use comparing methods for analizing the legislative provisions; the structural method and historical method was used for the background of Legal procedure in roman law. Results and conclusions: In this article we will outline the main stages of formation of legal protection of human rights in Roman law and characterize types of these processes – namely legis actiones, formulary procedure and cognitio. By analyzing the original sources that have survived to our times, namely the Law of Twelve Tables, Gaius`s Institutions and Justinian`s Digestes, we will examine what peculiarities of consideration and resolution of cases each of these stages demonstrated; how the traditional views on the behavior of the parties and the court in the process were established; which main requirements were applied to justice in civil matters in Roman law. The course of the work the following methods were used: essential, comparative, general historical.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference20 articles.

1. ARISTOTLE Politics.2005. Aristotle; transl. in Russian by S.А. Zhebelev, М.L. Gasparova.АСТ: Transitkniga,. pp.237.

2. BRACHO FUENMAYOR, Pedro Luis. Justicia desde la óptica de John Rawls y Robert Nozick: una perspectiva comparada. In: https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/issue/view/cuestpol.3970.00/272

3. CIVIL Litigation in a Globalizing World.2012.eds.: X. E. Kramer, C. H. van Rhee. Hague.Asser Press.

4. EUROPIAN Traditions in Civil Procedure.2005. ed:. C. H. van Rhee. Oxford. Intersentia Antwerpen,.# XVI, pp.344.

5. GAIUS Institutions In: http://thelatinlibrary.com/law/gaius.html.Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3