Standards of fair justice and their relationship to standards of proof in criminal proceedings

Author:

Kovalchuk Serhii1ORCID,Korytko Liliia2ORCID,Kret Galyna3ORCID,Fomin Serhii4ORCID,Hryniuk Volodymyr5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University «Odessa Law Academy»

2. Head of the Department of General Legal and Human Sciences of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University «Odessa Law Academy»

3. Judge of Grand Chamber, Supreme Court

4. Judge of Criminal Cassation Court, Supreme Court

5. Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to define the concept, system and content of fair justice standards and outline their relationship to standards of evidence in criminal proceedings. The purpose of the study is to reveal the content of the right to a fair trial, distinguish fair justice standards and establish its relationship with standards of evidence in criminal proceedings. The research methodology consists of comparative law, structural system methods and formal legal methods. The study found that testing standards are covered by justice standards, expanding, specifying, and clarifying their content. The content of the fair justice standards "examination of the case by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law", "adversarial procedure", "equality of the parties", "frankness of the examination of evidence", "presumption of innocence" and reveals the "motivation of judicial decisions". It is concluded that each of these concepts is a heuristic contribution to test standards. As a result of the study, the author's definition of the concept of "fair justice standards" is formulated and the concept is based on its relationship with the standards of evidence in criminal proceedings.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference43 articles.

1. ALEKSEEVSKAYA, Ekateryna. 2016. “Establishing a single level of legal guarantees for a fair trial in the legal regulation of legal proceedings is a means of effectively ensuring human rights” In: Law: Journal of the Higher School of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 100-110. Available online. In: https://law-journal.hse.ru/data/2016/07/13/1116455761/%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F.pdf. Date of consultation: 12/03/2020.

2. BASAY, Viktor; HRYNIUK, Volodymyr; KOVALCHUK, Serhii. 2019. “Standards of proof in the criminal procedure of the United States of America and Ukraine: A comparative research” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, Issue 22, pp. 550-559. Available online. In: https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/801. Date of consultation: 12/03/2020.

3. BEREZHANSKY, Genadii. 2017. “Features of understanding the right to a fair trial” In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings, Vol. 3, pp. 191–196. Available online. In: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2017_3_23. Date of consultation: 12/006/2020.

4. BOGGS, Danny. 1998. “The Right to a Fair Trial” In: University of Chicago Legal Forum. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-24.

5. BORYSLAVSKA, Оlena. 2021. “Judicial Reforms in Eastern Europe: Ensuring the Right to a Fair Trial or an Attack on the Independence of the Judiciary?” In: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 122-142.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3