Author:
,Senthil Murugan S.,Sathiya P.,
Abstract
This review paper discusses the recent research work carried out in the frictional joining of dissimilar and similar alloys through the friction welding (FW) process with various parameters and modifications. It includes further the latest developments and advances in the research on FW and the influences of FW’s process parameters on the quality of joints and their properties. The specimens’ faying surfaces can also influence the joint properties as the surface modifications stimulate or change the metal joints’ bonding according to the welding parameters selected during FW. Though the rise of friction pressure (FP) during FW improves the strength of the joints, the improper selection of parameters leads to metal damage. It feels better if the axial shortening is less than 30 mm for FW of soft metals. The axial shortening values are less than 25 mm for the hemispherical bowl-type faying surfaces under 18 bar FP and it is noted that the bevel-type tapered faying surfaces increase the shortening. FW provided very narrow weld interfaces with around 5-10 µm width. With a low FP, it was possible to obtain a maximum of 100 % efficiency by modifying their faying surfaces. The small-diameter soft material needs less FP and friction time. The microstructure modification is possible and the weld joint is shown as U and V shapes for the bowl and tapered faying surfaces. It further increases the contact area and thus increases strength.
Publisher
Universitatea Dunarea de Jos din Galati
Reference140 articles.
1. "[1] Manideep D., Balachandar K., Welding Parameters-Metallurgical Properties Correlation of Friction Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel and Ferritic Stainless Steel, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, pp. 1013-1019, 2012, 10.3923/jas.2012.1013.1019.
2. [2] Wang G. L., Li J. L., Wang W. L. et al., Rotary friction welding on dissimilar metals of aluminum and brass by using pre-heating method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 99, pp. 1293 - 1300, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2572-y.
3. [3] Gawhar I. K., Baban S. A., Efficiency of Dissimilar Friction Welded 1045Medium Carbon Steel and 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel Joints, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 8(2), pp. 1926-1932, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.01.010.
4. [4] Chennakesava R. Alavala, Weldability of Friction Welding Process for AA2024 Alloy and SS304 Stainless Steel using Finite Element Analysis, International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, Vol. 6 (3), pp. 53-57, 2016.
5. [5] Dong H., Yang J., Li Y., Xia Y., Hao X., Li P., Sun D., Hu J., Zhou W., Lei M., Evolution of interface and tensile properties in 5052 aluminium alloy/304 stainless steel rotary friction welded joint after post-weld heat treatment, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 51, pp. 142-150, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.038
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献