Affiliation:
1. ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
2. ISTANBUL AREL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE
Abstract
This study addresses the vital challenge of ensuring the safe storage of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) in spherical tanks during seismic events, focusing on the crucial balance between meeting seis- mic performance criteria and mitigating economic losses due to potential operational disrup- tions from necessary retrofitting efforts. In response to this challenge, we present a case study on retrofitting an LNG tank near the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) line of Türkiye. Through a com- prehensive seismic evaluation, this study reveals inadequacies in the existing case's compliance with seismic criteria. It suggests a remedy involving the increased stiffness of lateral force-resist- ing members coupled with the utilization of friction dampers. Following the proposed stiffness increase achieved through retrofitting, our approach is fundamental to exploring alternative damping mechanisms designed to enhance the steel column-brace support structure. One of the key design challenges is the unique dynamic behavior of LNG, especially its sloshing during earthquakes, which necessitates a comprehensive understanding of fluid-structure interaction for accurate modeling and analysis. Through a series of transient analyses incorporating actions, we evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed retrofitting measures on the structure. Our findings introduce a feasible and efficient retrofitting strategy, marked by minimal operational interrup- tion, primarily by avoiding the extensive demolition and reconstruction typically required.
Publisher
Yildiz Technical University
Reference23 articles.
1. 1. Shekari, M. R., Khaji, N., & Ahmadi, M. T. (2010). On the seismic behavior of cylindrical base-isolated liquid storage tanks excited by long-period ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 30, 968–980. [CrossRef]
2. 2. Niwa, A., & Clough, R. W. (1982). Buckling of cylin- drical liquid-storage tanks under earthquake load- ing. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 10, 107–122. [CrossRef]
3. 3. Shaban, N., Ozdemir, S., Caner, A., & Akyüz, U. (2017, June 15-17). Seismic retrofit of buildings with backbone dampers. In Proceedings of the ECCO- MAS Thematic Conference—COMPDYN 2017: 6th International Conference on Computational Meth- ods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engi- neering: An IACM Special Interest Conference, Pro- gramme, Rhodos Island, Greece. [CrossRef]
4. 4. Gregoriou, V. P., Tsinopoulos, S. V., & Karabalis, D. L. (2011, May 25-28). Dynamic analysis of liquefied natural gas tanks seismically protected with energy dissipating base isolation systems. In Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference—COMP- DYN 2011: 3rd International Conference on Com- putational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: An IACM Special Interest Conference, Programme, Corfu, Greece.
5. 5. Jadhav, M. B., & Jangid, R. S. (2006). Response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks to near-fault mo- tions. Struct Eng Mech, 23, 615–634. [CrossRef]