The four weeks before lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a weekly serial cross-sectional survey on risk perceptions, knowledge, public trust and behaviour, 3 to 25 March 2020

Author:

Betsch Cornelia1ORCID,Korn Lars21ORCID,Burgard Tanja3,Gaissmaier Wolfgang4,Felgendreff Lisa1,Eitze Sarah1,Sprengholz Philipp1,Böhm Robert56,Stollorz Volker7,Ramharter Michael8,Promies Nikolai9,De Bock Freia10,Schmid Philipp1,Renner Britta4,Wieler Lothar H11,Bosnjak Michael1211

Affiliation:

1. University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany

2. Department of Implementation Science, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany

3. Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information and Documentation, Trier, Germany

4. University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

5. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

6. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Science Media Center Germany gGmbH, Köln, Germany

8. Department of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine and I. Dep. of Medicine University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

9. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

10. Federal Centre for Health Education, Köln, Germany

11. Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany

12. University of Trier, Trier, Germany

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, public perceptions and behaviours have had to adapt rapidly to new risk scenarios and radical behavioural restrictions. Aim To identify major drivers of acceptance of protective behaviours during the 4-week transition from virtually no COVID-19 cases to the nationwide lockdown in Germany (3–25 March 2020). Methods A serial cross-sectional online survey was administered weekly to ca 1,000 unique individuals for four data collection rounds in March 2020 using non-probability quota samples, representative of the German adult population between 18 and 74 years in terms of age × sex and federal state (n = 3,910). Acceptance of restrictions was regressed on sociodemographic variables, time and psychological variables, e.g. trust, risk perceptions, self-efficacy. Extraction of homogenous clusters was based on knowledge and behaviour. Results Acceptance of restrictive policies increased with participants’ age and employment in the healthcare sector; cognitive and particularly affective risk perceptions were further significant predictors. Acceptance increased over time, as trust in institutions became more relevant and trust in media became less relevant. The cluster analysis further indicated that having a higher education increased the gap between knowledge and behaviour. Trust in institutions was related to conversion of knowledge into action. Conclusion Identifying relevant principles that increase acceptance will remain crucial to the development of strategies that help adjust behaviour to control the pandemic, possibly for years to come. Based on our findings, we provide operational recommendations for health authorities regarding data collection, health communication and outreach.

Publisher

European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)

Subject

Virology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3