Affiliation:
1. Department of Periodontology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
2. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
The aim of this article was to compare baseline residual ridge height using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiographs. A secondary aim was to examine the magnitude of vertical bone gain 6 months after trans-crestal sinus augmentation and compare it between operators. Thirty patients, who underwent trans-crestal sinus augmentation simultaneously with dental implant placement, were included in this retrospective analysis. Surgeries were done by 2 experienced surgeons (EM and EG) using the same surgical protocol and materials. Preoperative residual ridge height was measured on panoramic and CBCT images. The final bone height and the magnitude of the vertical augmentation were measured on panoramic X ray taken 6 months after surgery. Mean residual ridge height measured preoperatively using CBCT was 6.07 ± 1.38 mm, whereas these same measurements on the panoramic radiographs yielded similar results (6.08 ± 1.43 mm), which were statistically insignificant (P = .535). Postoperative healing was uneventful in all cases. All 30 implants were successfully osseointegrated at 6 months. The mean overall final bone height was 12.87 ± 1.39 mm (12.61 ± 1.21 and 13.39 ± 1.63 mm for operators EM and EG, respectively; P = .19). Likewise, mean postoperative bone height gain was 6.78 ± 1.57 mm, which was 6.68 ± 1.32 and 6.99 ± 2.06 mm for operators EM and EG, respectively (P = .66). A moderate positive correlation was found between residual bone height and final bone height (r = 0.43, P = .002). A moderate negative correlation was found between residual bone height and augmented bone height (r = −0.53, P = .002). Sinus augmentation performed trans-crestally produce consistent results with minimal interoperator differences between experienced clinicians. Both CBCT and panoramic radiographs produced similar assessment of the preoperative residual bone height.
Publisher
American Academy of Implant Dentistry
Reference36 articles.
1. Pietrokovski
J,
Massler,
M.
Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction.
J Prosthet Dent.
1967;
17:
21–
27.
2. Schropp
L,
Wenzel
A,
Kostopoulos
L,
Karring
T.
Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: a clinical and radiograhic 12-month prospective study.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
2003;
23:
313–
323.
3. Ulm
CW,
Solar
P,
Gsellmann
B,
Matejka
M,
Watzek
G.
The edentulous maxillary alveolar process in the region of the maxillary sinus: a study of physical dimension.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
1995;
24:
279–
282.
4. Aparicio
C,
Perales
P,
Rangert,
B.
Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2001;
3:
39–
49
5. Morand
M,
Irinakis
T.
The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants.
J Oral Implantol.
2007;
33:
257–
266.