Ceramic Implant Rehabilitation: Consensus Statements from Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology: Consensus Statements on Ceramic Implant

Author:

Schnurr Etyene12,Sperlich Mathias3,Sones Amerian4,Romanos George E.5,Rutkowski J. L.6,Duddeck Dirk U.7,Neugebauer Jörg8,Att Wael9,Sperlich Markus3,Volz Karl Ulrich10,Ghanaati Shahram11

Affiliation:

1. 1 Ceramic and Biological Dentistry Foundation, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.

2. 2 Basic Science Department, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.

3. 3 Private Practice, Freiburg, Germany.

4. 4 Board of Directors of the Academy of Osseointegration.

5. 5 Department of Periodontology and Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

6. 6 Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.

7. 7 CleanImplant Foundation, Berlin, Germany.

8. 8 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.

9. 9 Department of Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

10. 10 Swiss Biohealth Clinic, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.

11. 11 Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.

Abstract

The objectives of the study group focused on the following main topics related to the performance of 1- and 2-piece ceramic implants: defining bone-implant-contact percentages and its measurement methods, evaluating the pink esthetic score as an esthetic outcome parameter after immediate implantation, recognizing the different results of ceramic implant designs as redefined by the German Association of Oral Implantology, incorporating the patient report outcome measure to include satisfaction and improvement in oral health–related quality of life, and conducting preclinical studies to address existing gaps in ceramic implants. During the Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology (2022), the study group evaluated 17 clinical trials published between 2015 and 2021. After extensive discussions and multiple closed sessions, consensus statements and recommendations were developed, incorporating all approved modifications. A 1-piece implant design features a coronal part that is fused to the implant body or interfaces with the postabutment restoration platform, undergoing transmucosal healing. Long-term evaluations of this implant design are supported by established favorable clinical evidence. Inaccuracies in the pink esthetic score and bone-implant-contact percentages were managed by establishing control groups for preclinical studies and randomizing clinical trials. The patient-reported outcome measures were adjusted to include an individual visual analog scale, collected from each clinical study, that quantified improved oral health and quality of life. Preclinical investigations should focus on examining the spread of ceramic debris and the impact of heat generation on tissue and cellular levels during drilling. Further technical advancements should prioritize wound management and developing safe drilling protocols.

Publisher

American Academy of Implant Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3