Affiliation:
1. Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Abstract
There are a lot of diseases known today, which are caused by genetic abnormalities. Advances in genetics and biotechnology brought about gene editing technologies that can produce almost any gene, which ultimately led to the emergence of a new class of medicines - gene therapy products (GTPs). The aim of the study was to analyse international experience in development and authorisation of GTPs. The review highlights the challenges in GTP development, related to the search for an optimal approach to therapeutic gene delivery to the target cells. Viral vectors were shown to be a promising gene delivery system, with adenovirus (AV) and adeno-associated virus (AAV) based products demonstrating the highest efficacy and safety. The paper reviews current approaches to gene editing that allow modification of AVs and AAVs to improve GTP efficacy and safety. These modifications are carried out with the aim of, e.g., including a large therapeutic gene into a viral vector, decreasing viral protein expression levels, and decreasing viral vector immunogenicity. The review summarises GTP authorisation procedures in the USA and the European Union, including data on FDA and EMA subcommittees and departments entrusted with advisory functions. The paper mentions that there is one Russian-produced GTP authorised in the Russian Federation, and some other GTPs are in the pipeline. Therefore, the Russian regulatory framework and the Eurasian regulations and recommendations should be updated in order to accommodate for GTP development and authorisation.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Soldatov AA, Avdeeva ZhI, Medunitsyn NV, Kryuchkov NA. Mechanisms of development of the undesirable immune response at use of biotechnological medicines. Immunologiya = Immunology. 2017;38(5):271–83 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18821/0206-4952-2017-38-5-271-283
2. Wirth T, Parker N, Ylä-Herttuala S. History of gene therapy. Gene. 2013;525:162–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.137
3. Cartier-Lacave N, Ali R, Yla-Herttuala S, Kato K, Baetschi B, Lovell-Badge R, et al. Debate on germline gene editing. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2016;27(4):135–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/hgtb.2016.28999.deb
4. McCarthy M. Scientists call for moratorium on clinical use of human germline editing. BMJ. 2015;351:h6603. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6603
5. Morrow T. Novartis’s Kymriah: harnessing immune system comes with worry about reining in costs. Manag Care. 2017;26(10):28–30.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献