Affiliation:
1. Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Abstract
Scientific relevance. Botulinum toxin preparations are a good example of using a deadly toxin as a unique therapeutic agent. However, there are many unresolved issues related to biotechnology, biological activity, interchangeability, and standardisation of botulinum toxin preparations. Aim. To review current opportunities for improving therapeutic botulinum toxin preparations.Discussion. This review covers botulinum toxin type A preparations and unresolved issues related to them. In the absence of international non-proprietary names recommended by the World Health Organisation or by the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission, domestic and imported botulinum toxin type A preparations approved in Russia have only similarity-based grouping names. In addition, manufacturers name botulinum toxin preparations at their discretion. Therefore, classifying these preparations under a common nomenclature is essential for clear identification, adequate selection, and correct prescription. Several studies have shown significant variability across botulinum toxin type A preparations. Due to the identified differences in qualitative and quantitative characteristics, botulinum toxin type A preparations cannot be considered similar, which raises the issue of their interchangeability and bioequivalence. To resolve this issue, a unified classification and naming system for botulinum toxin preparations should be established and documented in regulatory standards. According to the literature, manufacturers of botulinum toxin preparations use in-house reference standards. Hence, the same activity unit resulting from toxicity and efficacy studies may express a different protein load for each botulinum toxin preparation. Keeping that in mind, the authors discuss the development of a single international potency standard for existing and pipeline botulinum toxin type A preparations. Conclusions. The article describes novel pharmaceutical compositions containing botulinum toxin, including those in late development. Summarised data from clinical studies on the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A preparations can guide prescribing decisions.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Camargo CHF, Teive HAG. Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212586. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212586
2. Rader RA. Nomenclature of new biosimilars will be highly controversial. Bioprocess Int. 2011;9:26–33.
3. Boone B. Botulinum toxin in aesthetic medicine. In: Katsambas AD, Lotti TM, Dessinioti C, d’Erme AM, eds. European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. P. 1089–06. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45139-7
4. Choudhury S, Baker MR, Chatterjee S, Kumar H. Botulinum toxin: an update on pharmacology and newer products in development. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13010058
5. Artemenko AR, Kurenkov AL, Belomestova KV. On the absence of interchangeability of botulinum toxin type A drugs. Medical Council. 2015;(5):112–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2015-5-112-123