Non-clinical Studies of Radiopharmaceuticals: Analysis of National and International Regulatory Practice (Review)

Author:

Klementyeva O. E.1ORCID,Smirnova A. V.2ORCID,Kulbachevskaya N. Yu.1ORCID,Grigorieva E. Yu.1ORCID,Lagodzinskaya Yu. S.1ORCID,Gevorkyan T. G.1

Affiliation:

1. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

2. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center named after A. S. Loginov

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Currently in the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the conduct of non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals is regulated by general guidelines on non-clinical studies, which are applicable to multiple groups of medicinal products but do not accommodate the characteristics of radiopharmaceuticals.AIM. The study aimed to substantiate the need for methodological guidelines regulating non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals, taking into account global regulatory practice.DISCUSSION. The authors analysed the Russian and EAEU guidelines regulating non-clinical studies in general as well as international publications on non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals, including guidelines by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The analysis revealed the need for terminology harmonisation. This article describes the aspects specific to radiopharmaceuticals that limit the applicability of general guidelines to non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals. Subchronic toxicity studies based on inactive formulations do not account for the contribution of radionuclide emission to the biological effects of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. The authors suggest that systemic toxicity studies of finished dosage forms should use single-dose chronic toxicity protocols.CONCLUSIONS. It is necessary to develop and implement up-to-date methodological guidelines for conducting non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals to reduce potential risks in the application of these medicinal products. This requires factoring in different requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, with due consideration of radiation safety requirements. When drafting guidelines for non-clinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals, regulators should keep in mind the applicable guidelines by the FDA, EMA, and IAEA. A list of mandatory studies should be compiled, and uninformative studies should be excluded from the requirements for radiopharmaceuticals.

Publisher

SCEEMP

Reference13 articles.

1. Kodina GE, Malysheva AO. The main issues of quality assurance of radiopharmaceuticals. Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2019;9(4):216–30 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2019-9-4-216-230

2. Klementyeva OE, Lunev AS, Lunyova KA. Methodological approaches to preclinical evaluation of general toxicity of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. 2021;11(4):255–62 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-4-255-262

3. Guskova TA. Preclinical toxicological study of drugs as a guarantee of their safe clinical investigations. Toxicological Review. 2010;(5):2–5 (In Russ.). EDN: TQUMYX

4. Verstakova OL. Issues emerging from conducting preclinical expertise of medical products safety. Toxicological Review. 2010;(5):6–11 (In Russ.). EDN: TQUMZH

5. Tsyb A, Garbuzov P, Davydov G, Skvortsov V. Current state and prospects for the use of radionuclides in medicine. Atomic Energy Bulletin. 2003;(8):39–42 (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3