Author:
Fahmy Syahrul,Deraman Aziz,Yahaya Jamaiah,Hamdan Abdul Razak
Abstract
Late product delivery is a common problem in software projects. Late delivery can be attributed to software change especially in the development and maintenance phases, leading to more work than originally planned, thus increasing project completion time. One approach for managing software change is Software Configuration Management (SCM). SCM was first introduced in the 1970s to ensure the timely delivery of software products. To date, SCM implementation is supported by recognized standards, best practice, and countless commercial and proprietary tools. However, after more than 50 years, the issue of late software product delivery still prevails, questioning the practice of SCM in software organizations. One aspect of SCM that has received little focus in mainstream research is the human aspects. This study aims to identify how the competency of SCM practitioners can be assessed through the identification of SCM competency criteria and the development of a competency assessment framework. The framework was validated through expert reviews and case studies involving practitioners from the public sector, industry, institutes of higher learning and international organizations. Results confirmed the reliability of the SCM competency criteria and the plausibility of the competency assessment framework.
Publisher
International Association for Educators and Researchers (IAER)
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,General Computer Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Irina Brudaru and Andreas Zeller. (2008). What is the Long-Term Impact of Changes? In Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Recommendation systems for software engineering. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 30–32. DOI:10.1145/1454247.1454257.
2. Pierre Bourque and Richard Fairley. (2014). Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK(R)): Version 3.0 (3rd ed.). IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, USA. ISBN:9780769551661.
3. Pulse of the Profession 2015: Capturing the Value of Project Management. Available http://www.pmi.org/learning/pulse.aspx.
4. Chintan Amrit, Maya Daneva, Daniela Damian. (2014). Human Factors in Software Development: On its Underlying Theories and the Value of Learning From Related Disciplines. A guest editorial introduction to the special issue, Information and Software Technology, 56(12): 1537-1542. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.006.
5. Jingdong Jia, Pengnan Zhang and Luiz Fernando Capretz. (2016). Environmental Factors Influencing Individual Decision-Making Behavior in Software Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 86–92. DOI:10.1145/2897586.2897589.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献