Effect of Regional Anesthesia on Oncological Outcomes (Meta-Analysis)

Author:

Kadantseva Kristina K.1,Yadgarov Mikhail Ya.2,Subbotin Valerii V.1,Berikashvili Levan B.3,Akchulpanov Roman A.4,Smirnova Anastasia V.2,Kuznetsov Ivan V.2,Ryzhkov Pavel V.2,Zolotareva Ekaterina A.5,Kuzovlev Artem N.2,Likhvantsev Valery V.6

Affiliation:

1. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow Department of Health

2. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology

3. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

4. A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow Department of Health

5. I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

6. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Abstract

Metastatic processes remain the main cause of deaths in oncology. Methods of anesthesia, in particular regional anesthesia, are considered as potential modulators of the immune response and metastatic spread. The ambiguity of the available data on the effect of regional and general anesthesia on metastatic spread is partly due to the fact that general anesthetic in combined anesthesia is quite often not taken into account, and this, in turn, masks the possible influence of regional anesthesia.The purpose of this meta-analysis was to make a comparative assessment of the effect of general anesthesia and general anesthesia in combination with regional anesthesia on the relapse-free and overall survival of cancer patients after surgery.Materials and methods. We analyzed 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1822 patients and comparing the groups of cancer patients who were operated either under general anesthesia (total intravenous (TIVA) or inhalation (IA)), or general anesthesia in combination with regional anesthesia (TIVA+RA or IA+RA, respectively). Trial using combinations of inhaled and intravenous anesthetics was excluded from the analysis for a more accurate assessment of the effect of regional anesthesia. The study complies with the recommendations of the Cochrane Community and PRISMA standards. The protocol was registered on the INPLASY platform. We used PubMed, Google Scholar and CENTRAL databases. We used a subgroup analysis and GRADE tool to assess the quality of evidence.Results. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse-free and overall survival when comparing different anesthesia methods. For a relapse-free survival, comparing TIVA vs TIVA+RA resulted in no significant difference : OR=1.20 [95% CI 0.92-1.55]; when IA vs IA+RA were compared, OR=1.10 [95% CI 0.94-1.29]. Similar results were obtained for overall survival.Conclusion. Based on the meta-analysis results, regional anesthesia had no effect on relapse-free and overall survival in oncosurgery patients.

Publisher

FSBI SRIGR RAMS

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3