Synthetic Analogue of Leu-Enkephalin in COVID-19 (a Prospective Clinical Study)
-
Published:2022-08-25
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:11-19
-
ISSN:2411-7110
-
Container-title:General Reanimatology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Obŝaâ reanimatologiâ
Author:
Magomedov M. A.1, Burda N. G.2, Misikov Z. F.3, Ryzhkov A. Yu.4, Antonova V. V.5, Cherpakov R. A.5
Affiliation:
1. N. I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1, Moscow City Health Department; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Medical Research University, Ministry of Health of Russia 2. V. V. Vinogradov Municipal Clinical Hospital № 40 3. City Clinical Hospital № 24, Moscow Department of Health 4. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology,
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology 5. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology,
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; N. V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow Department of Health
Abstract
One of the main problems facing intensivists when treating patients with COVID-19 is severe and critical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with the underlying viral pneumonia. The current guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health (Version 15 of 22.02.22) do not include drugs with a lung protective effect. This issue could be solved by administration of a synthetic analogue of leu-enkephalin.Aim. Study the efficacy of a synthetic analogue of leu-enkephalin in ARDS in patients with COVID-19.Materials and methods. The study included 35 patients divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (main) patients (n=15) in addition to standard therapy received a continuous infusion of synthetic analogue of leu-enkephalin at a rate of 5 µg/kg/hour for 5 days. Patients from group 2 (control, n=20) were treated according to the Temporary Guidelines of the Ministry of Health (V.15), but without the synthetic analogue of leu-enkephalin. The radiological data, frequency, severity and evolution of respiratory complications, changes in P/F (PaO2/FiO2) ratio, as well as changes in the scores of prognostic APACHE II, SOFA, and NEWS scales were evaluated.Results. In patients taking the studied drug, the percentage of lung damage did not change with the median (IQR) of 0 [–8; 0], while in the control group it increased by approximately 10% with the median (IQR) of +10,0 [+2; +20] (P=0.001). The proportion of patients in group 1 with positive disease evolution within 5–9 days after treatment initiation was significantly higher and reached 46.7 [24.8; 69.9]%, whereas in group 2 it was 15.0 [5.2; 36.0]% (P=0.04). Also, in group 1, starting from day 4, the median P/F ratio was significantly higher than in group 2 reaching 220 [185;245] versus 127 [111;158], respectively (P=0.014). The need for non-invasive lung ventilation in group 1 on day 7 averaged 7%, while in group 2 it was as high as 45.0%, which was significantly higher than in the main group (P=0.013).Conclusions. The use of synthetic analogue of leu-enkephalin according to the specified regimen had a significant impact on the main parameters of the viral pneumonia severity. The results serve as a rationale for the development of a novel effective treatment strategy to supplement the current standard COVID-19 management.
Publisher
FSBI SRIGR RAMS
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. Chen R, Lan Z, Ye J, Pang L, Liu Y, Wu W, Qin X., Guo Y, Zhang P. Cytokine storm: the primary determinant for the pathophysiological evolution of COVID-19 deterioration. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 589095. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.589095 PMID: 33995341. 2. Osuchowski M.F., Winkler M.S., Skirecki T., Cajander S., Shankar-Hari M., Lachmann G., Monneret G., Venet F., Bauer M., Brunkhorst F.M., Weis S., Garcia-Salido A., Kox M., Cavaillon J-M., Uhle F., Weigand M.A., Flohé S.B., Wiersinga W.J., Almansa R., de la Fuente R.A., Martin-Loeches I., Meisel C., Spinetti T., Schefold J.C., Cilloniz C., Torres A., Giamarellos-Bourboulis e.J. Ferrer R., Girardis M., Cossarizza A., Netea M.G., van der Poll T., Bermejo-Martín J.F., Rubio I. The COVID- 19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity. Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9 (6): 622-642. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600 (21)00218-6. PMID: 33965003. 3. Shloznikov B.M., Likhvantsev V.V., Kuznetsov A.Yu., Peretrukhin A.I., Tverskoĭ A.L., Machulin A.V., Grin'ko A.N. Dalargin — a basic means of intraoperative protection of a patient during correction of an atrial septal defect under conditions of artificial circulation: a new method of anesthesia. Anesthesiol Reanimatol./ Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 1989; 4: 21–25. (in Russ.). PMID: 2817493. 4. Likhvantsev V. V., Smirnova V. I., Kuznetsov A. Yu., Peretrukhin A.I., Kakurin F.F., Grin'ko A.N. Comparative aspects of the use of dalargin in comprehensive anesthesiologic protection during the surgical correction of congenital heart defects. Anesthesiol Reanimatol / Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya.1993; 4: 23–28. (in Russ.) PMID: 8239021. 5. Onopriev V.I., Zabolotskikh I.B., Malyshev Yu.P. Dynamics of complications in the early postoperative period in gastroenterological patients in 1994–1998. The role of anesthesia optimization. Ann Crit Care./Vestnik intensivnoy terapii im AI Saltanova. 1999; 5 (6): 36–40]. (In Russ.).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|