Impact of Anesthesia Method on Immune Response in Patients Undergoing Radical Surgery for Breast Cancer (a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Clinical Studies)

Author:

Likhvantsev V. V.1,Landoni G.2,Subbotin V. V.3,Kadantseva K. K.4,Zhukova L. A.5,Yadgarov M. Ya.3,Beletti A.6,Novikov A. A.5,Berikashvili L. B.3,Kuzovlev A. N.3

Affiliation:

1. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

3. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology

4. V. A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; A. S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow Department of Health

5. A. S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow Department of Health

6. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Abstract

Introduction and aim. Recent evidence suggests that inhalation anesthesia (IA) is associated with higher cancer mortality than total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), possibly due to a modulation of the immune response.The aim of this study was to determine the impact of anesthesia techniques on selected parameters of patient immunity considering the evidence of relationship between the anesthesia methods and immune status and, consequently, the incidence of cancer recurrence.Methods. We performed a meta-analysis of clinical studies published in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases, aimed at assessing the impact of anesthesia on the postoperative immune status of patients undergoing breast cancer (BC) surgery. Five randomized and three observational studies were included (a total of 637 patients, of which 320 (50.2%) in the TIVA group). Data on leukocyte counts, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 9 and 3, interleukins (IL) 6 and 10 levels, and neutrophil-lymphocyte index (NLI) values were retrieved.Results. Patients after breast cancer surgery who underwent TIVA had significantly lower white blood cell counts (standardized mean difference (SMD)=–0.32; 95% CI: –0.58 to –0.06; I2=58%, P=0.020) and MMP-9 (SMD=–0.35; 95% CI: –0.67 to –0.03; P=0.030; I2=0%) in the postoperative period compared with patients receiving IA. No significant differences in the levels of MMP-3, IL-6, IL-10, and NLI values were found between the two groups.Conclusion. The patients who underwent breast cancer surgery under TIVA had lower blood leukocyte counts and levels of MMP-9, which is involved in the remodeling of extracellular matrix, compared with those operated on under IA, suggesting that the anesthesia method may have an impact on the immunity of breast cancer patients.

Publisher

FSBI SRIGR RAMS

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Tsimberidou A.M., Fountzilas E., Nikanjam M., Kurzrock R. Review of precision cancer medicine: evolution of the treatment paradigm. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020; 86: 102019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102019. PMID: 32251926.

2. Zaimy M.A., Saffarzadeh N., Mohammadi A., Pourghadamyari H., Izadi P., Sarli A., Moghaddam LK., Paschepari SR., Azizi H., Torkamandi S., Tavakkoly-Bazzaz J. New methods in the diagnosis of cancer and gene therapy of cancer based on nanoparticles. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017; 24 (6): 233–243. DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2017.16. PMID: 28574057.

3. Sullivan R., Alatise O.I., Anderson B.O., Audisio R., Autier P., Aggarwal A., Balch C., Brennan M.F., Dare A., D'Cruz A., Eggermont A.M., Fleming K., Gueye S.M., Hagander L., Herrera C.A., Holmer H., Ilbawi A.M., Jarnheimer A., Ji J.F., Kingham T.P., Liberman J., Leather A.J.M., Meara J.G., Mukhopadhyay S., Murthy S.S., Omar S., Parham G.P., Pramesh C.S., Riviello R., Rodin D., Santini L., Shrikhande S.V., Shrime M., Thomas R., Tsunoda A.T., van de Velde C., Veronesi U., Vijaykumar D.K., Watters D., Wang S., Wu Y-L., Zeiton M., Purushotham A. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe., affordable., and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16 (11): 1193–1224. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00223-5. PMID: 26427363.

4. Soltanizadeh S., Degett T.H., Gögenur I. Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: a systematic review. J Clin Anesth. 2017; 42: 19–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.08.001. PMID: 28797751.

5. Snyder G.L., Greenberg S. Effect of anaesthetic technique and other perioperative factors on cancer recurrence. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105 (2): 106–115. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq164. PMID: 20627881.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3