Author:
Mittinty Manasi M.,Mittinty Murthy N.,Buchbinder Rachelle,Lassere Marissa,Chand Vibhasha,Whittle Samuel,March Lyn,Hill Catherine
Abstract
ObjectiveDyadic coping, the process of coping that transpires between couples challenged by one partner’s illness, is an important predictor of disease adjustment and patient well-being. However, the extent of dyadic coping in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains unclear. This study examines the effect of dyadic coping on psychological distress and relationship quality from the perspectives of both participants with RA and their spouses.MethodsParticipants and their spouses were invited to participate in an online survey study if they were aged ≥ 18 years and had lived together for more than a year. The survey included the Chronic Pain Grade Scale, Dyadic Coping Inventory, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, and Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Participants and spouses completed the survey independently. The actor-partner interdependence model was used to analyze the dyadic data.ResultsOne hundred sixty-three couples participated. Our findings showed that participants who reported higher supportive dyadic coping reported lower depression, anxiety, and stress, and higher relationship quality, whereas participants who reported higher negative dyadic coping reported higher depression, anxiety, and stress, and lower relationship quality. Spouses who reported higher supportive dyadic coping reported higher relationship quality, but no effect on depression, anxiety, and stress was observed. In contrast, spouses who reported higher negative dyadic coping reported higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, and lower relationship quality.ConclusionParticipants’ and spouses’ perceptions of supportive and negative dyadic coping closely influenced their psychological distress and relationship quality. Further, having a partner with RA also seemed to affect the spouse, especially when there was a negative dyadic coping pattern.
Publisher
The Journal of Rheumatology
Reference57 articles.
1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s health 2016. [Internet. Accessed May 1, 2024] Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/9844cefb-7745-4dd8-9ee2-f4d1c3d6a727/19787-ah16.pdf.aspx
2. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
3. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics . National Health Survey: first results [Internet]; 2017-2018. [Accessed May 6, 2024]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/national-health-survey/2017-18
5. Australian Inst of Health and Welfare . Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Burden of Disease Study 2015: interactive data on disease burden. [Internet. Accessed May 1, 2024.] Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/abds-2015-interactive-data-disease-burden/contents/summary
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献