Abstract
ObjectiveNailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is increasingly used in the early identification of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related disorders. A consensus "Fast Track algorithm" was developed by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology to aid differentiation of scleroderma from nonscleroderma pattern on NFC. Our objective was to evaluate the online training of NFC using the Fast Track algorithm in the assessment of scleroderma vs nonscleroderma NFC pattern.MethodsParticipants attended the NFC online training workshop and were taught the Fast Track algorithm. Following the training, participants independently evaluated 45 NFC images in the same session, and then 2 to 4 weeks later, through the online platform. Participants had to differentiate between scleroderma vs nonscleroderma pattern, and additionally nonscleroderma pattern (normal) vs nonscleroderma pattern (nonspecific). The inter- and intrarater Cohen κ agreement was calculated.ResultsNinety-eight participants took part in the baseline evaluation, and 61 in the reevaluation session. For identification of scleroderma vs nonscleroderma pattern, the mean (95% CI) inter- and intrarater κ were 0.86 (0.83-0.88) and 0.83 (0.79-0.87), respectively. The overall inter- and intrarater κ in the identification of scleroderma, nonscleroderma (normal), and nonscleroderma (nonspecific) patterns were 0.71 (0.69-0.74) and 0.71 (0.67-0.75), respectively. For nonscleroderma (normal) vs nonscleroderma (nonspecific) pattern, the inter- and intrarater κ were 0.59 (0.55-0.63) and 0.59 (0.54-0.65), respectively.ConclusionIn this first study evaluating NFC online training using the Fast Track algorithm, we showed very good inter- and intrarater agreement for the identification of scleroderma and nonscleroderma NFC pattern, supporting the feasibility of online NFC standardized training workshops.
Publisher
The Journal of Rheumatology
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献