Author:
Singh Jasvinder A.,Dohm Michael,Sprowson Andrew P.,Wall Peter D.,Richards Bethan L.,Gossec Laure,Hawker Gillian A.,Riddle Daniel L.,Buchbinder Rachelle
Abstract
Objective.To develop a plan for harmonizing outcomes for people undergoing total joint replacement (TJR), to achieve consensus regarding TJR outcome research.Methods.The TJR working group met during the 2014 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 12 meeting in Budapest, Hungary. Multiple conference calls preceded the face-to-face meeting. Brief presentations were made during a 1.5-h meeting, which included an overview of published systematic reviews of TJR trials and the results of a recent systematic review of TJR clinical trial outcome domains and measures. This was followed by discussion of potential core set areas/domains for TJR clinical trials (as per OMERACT Filter 2.0) as well as the challenges associated with the measurement of these domains.Results.Working group participants discussed which TJR clinical trial outcome domains/areas map to the inner versus outer core for core domain set. Several challenges were identified with TJR outcomes including how to best measure function after TJR, elucidating the source of the pre- and post-TJR joint pain being measured, joint-specific versus generic quality of life instruments and the importance of patient satisfaction and revision surgery as outcomes. A preliminary core domain set for TJR clinical trials was proposed and included pain, function, patient satisfaction, revision, adverse events, and death. This core domain set will be further vetted with a broader audience.Conclusion.An international effort with active collaboration with the orthopedic community to standardize key outcome domains and measures is under way with the TJR working group. This effort will be further developed with new collaborations.
Publisher
The Journal of Rheumatology
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology
Reference41 articles.
1. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults —- United States, 2005;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2009
2. HCUP . Number of all-listed procedures for discharges from short-stay hospitals, by procedure category and age: United States, 2010. [Internet. Accessed February 18, 2015.] Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2010pro4_numberprocedureage.pdf
3. Medicare identifies 97 best and 95 worst hospitals for hip and knee replacements. [Internet. Accessed February 18, 2015.] Menlo Park, California: Kaiser Health News; 2013. Available from: www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2013/december/17/medicare-best-and-worst-hospitals-for-hip-and-knee-surgery.aspx
4. Increasing incidence of hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in 30- to 59-year-old patients;Skytta;Acta Orthop,2011
5. Past incidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献