What Has Been the Effect on Trial Outcome Assessments of a Decade of Patient Participation in OMERACT?

Author:

de Wit Maarten P.T.,Abma Tineke A.,Koelewijn-van Loon Marije S.,Collins Sarah,Kirwan John

Abstract

Objective.Since 2002, 58 patients have participated as collaborating partners in 6 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences. Little is known about how they engage with researchers and how they have influenced conference outcomes.Methods.A responsive evaluation was carried out, including a thematic document analysis of conference proceedings and gray literature, participant observation, and 38 interviews with patients and professionals representing research, industry, and regulators. Interview transcripts were subjected to an inductive content analysis.Results.The role of patients has evolved from a single focus group in 2002 to full integration in all parts of the conference in 2012. Longterm engagement has made a significant change in the scope and conduct of rheumatology research. It has enriched the research agenda by identifying previously neglected outcome domains such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, and flares, and it has contributed to more patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials. Facilitating factors have been a strong commitment of the leadership, adequate selection procedure, inclusive conference design, interactive and encouraging moderation style, and self-organized support. The intensity of the program and doubts regarding the representativeness of the patient group were still seen as challenges for the future.Conclusion.Making patient participation an integral part of the vision and procedures of OMERACT has significantly contributed to the success of OMERACT. It has changed the perceptions and beliefs of many participants. Full use of patients’ experiential knowledge before and during the conference is still challenging.

Publisher

The Journal of Rheumatology

Subject

Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology

Reference61 articles.

1. Broerse JEW Elberse JE Caron-Flinterman JFW Zweekhorst MBM . Enhancing a transition towards a needs-oriented health research system. In: Broerse JEW Bunders JFG , editors. Transitions in health systems: dealing with persistent problems. Amsterdam: VU University Press; 2010:181–205.

2. Staley K . Summary exploring impact: public involvement in NHS. Eastleigh: Public Health and Social Care Research INVOLVE; 2009.

3. Patient and Public Involvement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

4. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research

5. Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3