Differentiation between the intensity of breathlessness and the distress it evokes in normal subjects during exercise

Author:

Wilson Rachel C.1,Jones P. W.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Physiological Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, London

Abstract

1. This study was designed to examine whether normal subjects could differentiate between the ‘intensity’ of their breathlessness and the amount of ‘distress’ it evoked, by specific wording of the instructions. 2. A preliminary study showed no significant difference between ‘distress’ score during exercise measured on two separate occasions (P = 0.3). 3. Ten subjects each performed two identical incremental cycle-ergometer exercise tests on separate occasions during which they were asked to quantify either ‘intensity’ or ‘distress’ by using modified Borg scales. 4. In all subjects there was a significant correlation (P <0.001) between ‘intensity’ and minute ventilation. In eight subjects there was a significant correlation (P <0.05) between ‘distress’ and minute ventilation. One subject displayed no significant correlation and one registered no distress. 5. Mean ‘intensity’ was greater than the mean ‘distress’ (P = 0.0001). The slope of ‘intensity’/minute ventilation was greater than the slope of ‘distress’/minute ventilation (P = 0.0001). 6. Within individuals there was a significant correlation beween ‘intensity’ and ‘distress’ (P <0.05). There was a wide scatter in the slope of this relationship between subjects and maximum ‘intensity’ and ‘distress’ did not correlate. 7. Different elements of the breathlessness sensation could be identified and selectively measured depending on the wording of the instructions given to the subject. 8. There was a wide intersubject variation in the magnitude of both breathlessness ‘intensity’ and ‘distress’ estimates, but the differences between subjects in these two components of the sensation did not appear to follow a common pattern.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 91 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3