The statistical estimation of molecular weights from normal and difference ultracentrifuge boundaries

Author:

McCallum Margaret A.1,Spragg S. P.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.

Abstract

1. To determine molecular weights from boundary data taken from a sedimentation velocity experiment in an ultracentrifuge, the parameter s/D must be estimated. This can be obtained by using non-linear statistical methods to fit a mathematical model [the Fujita & MacCosham (1959) equation] to the results. 2. The statistical method chosen was the simplex method of Nelder & Mead (1965), which was found to be ideal for this problem. Internal errors were calculated at the end of the search for the minimum in the residuals, but in general these errors were found to not represent the overall true error of the experiment. 3. Calculations of molecular weights of myoglobin showed that instabilities at low concentrations of protein (less than 0.8mg/ml) disturbed the calculation of s/D. If 1% (w/v) sucrose was included in the solvent, these instabilities were decreased, and extrapolating to infinite time the linear function of s versus 1/(time) gave an acceptable value for s with an error of ±4.8%. The estimates of the molecular weights were less well-defined and the mean value was low by 8%, with an estimated error of the mean of ±3%. The conclusion was that vibration was responsible for the instabilities without sucrose. 4. The Fujita–MacCosham equation can be extended to make it possible to estimate ratios of sedimentation and molecular weights for difference boundaries. Tests using two solutions of orosomucoid in which a 2% decrease in velocity of one boundary was achieved by adding a calculated quantity of sucrose showed that the analysis gave realistic values for the two ratios, and the error for the ratio of sedimentation coefficients was ±10%. The error was larger for the estimated ratio of the molecular weights, but the analysis gave the expected value for the ratio.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3