Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
2. Department of Physiology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
3. Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QJ, U.K.
Abstract
Earlier reports have shown a remarkable synergism between InsP4 and InsP3 [either Ins(1,4,5)P3 or Ins(2,4,5)P3] in activating Ca2+-dependent K+ and Cl- currents in mouse lacrimal cells [Changya, Gallacher, Irvine, Potter and Petersen (1989) J. Membr. Biol. 109, 85-93; Smith (1992) Biochem. J. 283, 27-30]. However, Bird, Rossier, Hughes, Shears, Armstrong and Putney [(1991) Nature (London) 352, 162-165] reported that they could see no such synergism in the same cell type. A major experimental difference between the two laboratories lies in whether or not the cells were maintained in primary culture before use. Here we have compared directly the responses to inositol polyphosphates in freshly isolated cells versus cells cultured for 6-72 h. In the cultured cells, Ins(2,4,5)P3 at 100 μM produced a robust stimulation of K+ and Cl- currents, as much as an order of magnitude greater than that observed in the freshly isolated cells. However, the freshly isolated cells could be restored to a sensitivity similar to cultured cells by the addition of InsP4 at a concentration two orders of magnitude lower than that of Ins(2,4,5)P3. We discuss the implications of this with respect to the actions of InsP4, including the possibility that disruption of the cellular structure during the isolation of the cells exposes an extreme manifestation of a possible physiological role for InsP4 in controlling calcium-store integrity.
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献