An analysis of the ribosomal ribonucleic acids of Escherichia coli by hybridization techniques

Abstract

From analyses of the hybridization of Escherichia coli rRNA (ribosomal RNA) to homologous denatured DNA, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) When a fixed amount of DNA was hybridized with increasing amounts of RNA, only 0·35±0·02% of E. coli DNA was capable of binding (16s+23s) rRNA. Although preparations of 16s and 23s rRNA were virtually free from cross-contamination, the hybridization curves for purified 16s or 23s rRNA were almost identical with that of the parent specimen containing 1 weight unit of 16s rRNA mixed with 2 weight units of 23s rRNA. The 16s and 23s rRNA also competed effectively for the same specific DNA sites. It appears that these RNA species each possess all hybridizing species typical of the parent (16s+23s) rRNA specimen, though probably in different relative amounts. (2) By using hybridization-efficiency analysis of DNA–RNA hybridization curves (Avery & Midgley, 1969) it was found that (a) 0·45% of the DNA would hybridize total rRNA and (b) when so little RNA was added to unit weight of DNA that the DNA sites were not saturated, only 70–75% of the input RNA would form hybrids. The reasons for the discrepancy between the results obtained by the two alternative analytical approaches were discussed. (3) For either 16s or 23s rRNA, hybridization analysis indicated that two principal weight fractions of rRNA may exist, hybridizing to two distinct groups of DNA sites. However, these groups seem to be incompletely divided between the 16s and 23s fractions. Analysis suggested that (a) 85% of the 16s rRNA was hybridized to about half the DNA that specifically binds rRNA (0·23% of the total DNA). (b) 70% of the 23s rRNA hybridized to a further 0·23% of the DNA and (c) the minor fraction (15%) of 16s rRNA may be competitive with the major fraction (70%) of 23s rRNA. Conversely, the minor fraction (30%) of the 23s rRNA may compete with the major fraction (85%) of 16s rRNA. Models were proposed to explain the apparent lack of segregation of distinct RNA species in the two subfractions of rRNA. (4) If protein synthesis and ribosome maturation were inhibited in cells of an RCrel mutant, E. coli W 1665, by depriving them of an amino acid (methionine) essential for growth, the inhibition had no discernible effect on the relative rates of synthesis of rRNA species. The rRNA that accumulates in RCrel strains of E. coli after amino acid deprivation is apparently identical in its content of RNA species with that of the pre-existing mature RNA in the ribosomes. On the other hand, the messenger RNA is stabilized, and accumulates as about 15% of the RNA formed after withdrawal of the amino acid.