Cardiac output by Modelflow® method from intra-arterial and fingertip pulse pressure profiles

Author:

KENFACK Marcel AZABJI1,LADOR Federic1,LICKER Marc2,MOIA Christian1,TAM Enrico3,CAPELLI Carlo34,MOREL Denis2,FERRETTI Guido1

Affiliation:

1. Département de Physiologie, Centre Médical Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH–1211 Genève 4, Switzerland

2. Département d'Anesthésiologie, Pharmacologie et Soins Intensifs Chirurgicaux, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Bâtiment Opéra, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland

3. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche, School of Medicine, P.le Kolbe 4, I-33100, Udine, Italy

4. Microgravity, Ageing, Training, Immobility Center of Excellence, P.le Kolbe 4, I-33100, Udine, Italy

Abstract

Modelflow®, when applied to non-invasive fingertip pulse pressure recordings, is a poor predictor of cardiac output (Q, litre·min-1). The use of constants established from the aortic elastic characteristics, which differ from those of finger arteries, may introduce signal distortions, leading to errors in computing Q. We therefore hypothesized that peripheral recording of pulse pressure profiles undermines the measurement of Q with Modelflow®, so we compared Modelflow® beat-by-beat Q values obtained simultaneously non-invasively from the finger and invasively from the radial artery at rest and during exercise. Seven subjects (age, 24.0±2.9 years; weight, 81.2±12.6 kg) rested, then exercised at 50 and 100 W, carrying a catheter with a pressure head in the left radial artery and the photoplethysmographic cuff of a finger pressure device on the third and fourth fingers of the contralateral hand. Pulse pressure from both devices was recorded simultaneously and stored on a PC for subsequent Q computation. The mean values of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure at rest and exercise steady state were significantly (P<0.05) lower from the finger than the intra-arterial catheter. The corresponding mean steady-state Q obtained from the finger (Qporta) was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that computed from the intra-arterial recordings (Qpia). The line relating beat-by-beat Qporta and Qpia was y=1.55x-3.02 (r2=0.640). The bias was 1.44 litre·min-1 and the precision was 2.84 litre·min-1. The slope of this line was significantly higher than 1, implying a systematic overestimate of Q by Qporta with respect to Qpia. Consistent with the tested hypothesis, these results demonstrate that pulse pressure profiles from the finger provide inaccurate absolute Q values with respect to the radial artery, and therefore cannot be used without correction with a calibration factor calculated previously by measuring Q with an independent method.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3