Advanced analysis of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, blood pressure and heart rate variability in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Author:

MALBERG Hagen1,WESSEL Niels2,HASART Annett3,OSTERZIEL Karl-Josef3,VOSS Andreas4

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Applied Computer Sciences, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (Karlsruhe Research Center), P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

2. Nonlinear Dynamics Group at the Institute of Physics, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, P.O. Box 601553, D-14415 Potsdam, Germany

3. Franz Volhard Hospital, Humboldt University Berlin Charité, Wiltbergstr. 50, D-13125 Berlin, Germany

4. Department of Medical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Jena, P.O. Box 10 03 14, D-07703 Jena, Germany

Abstract

Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is an important parameter in the classification of patients with reduced left ventricular function. This study aimed at investigating BRS in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and in healthy subjects (controls), as well as comparing the values of BRS parameters with parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV). ECG, continuous blood pressure and respiration curves were recorded for 30min in 27 DCM patients and 27 control subjects. The Dual Sequence Method (DSM) includes the analysis of spontaneous fluctuations in systolic blood pressure and the corresponding beat-to-beat intervals of heart rate to estimate bradycardic, opposite tachycardic and delayed baroreflex fluctuations. The number of systolic blood pressure/beat-to-beat interval fluctuations in DCM patients was reduced in comparison with controls (DCM patients: male, 154.4±93.9ms/mmHg; female, 93.7±40.5ms/mmHg; controls: male, 245.5±112.9ms/mmHg; female, 150.6±55.8ms/mmHg, P < 0.05). The average slope in DCM patients was lower than in controls (DCM, 5.3±1.9ms/mmHg; controls, 8.0±5.4ms/mmHg; P < 0.05). Discriminant function analysis showed that, in the synchronous range of the standard sequence method, the DCM and control groups could be discriminated to only 76% accuracy, whereas the DSM gave an improved accuracy of 84%. The combination of six parameters of HRV, BPV and DSM gives an accuracy of classification of 96%, whereas six parameters of HRV and BPV could separate the two groups to only 88% accuracy. Thus the DSM leads to an improved characterization of autonomous regulation in order to differentiate between DCM patients and healthy subjects. BRS in DCM patients is significantly reduced and apparently less effective.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3