Derivation of the distensibility coefficient using tissue Doppler as a marker of arterial function

Author:

Haluska Brian A.1,Jeffriess Leanne1,Brown Joseph1,Downey Melodie1,Carlier Stephane G.2,Marwick Thomas H.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia

2. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022-1122, U.S.A.

Abstract

To date, the main cardiovascular application of TDI (tissue Doppler imaging) has been in myocardial evaluation. In the present study, we investigated the feasibility and reproducibility of assessing arterial elasticity using the DC (distensibility coefficient) measured by TDI, the correlation of this with the DC obtained by other methods and the DC in patients with various degrees of cardiovascular risk. We studied 450 subjects (256 men; age, 51±10 years) with and without risk factors of cardiovascular disease. Arterial displacement was measured from TDI, and B-mode and M-mode images of the common carotid artery in the longitudinal plane, and the DC with each method was compared. Linear regression showed a good correlation between all three methods. The results for TDI and B-mode were comparable [(21±10) compared with (21±10)×10−3/kPa respectively; P=not significant], but there were significant differences between TDI and M-mode [(21±10) compared with (31±13)×10−3/kPa respectively; P<0.0001] and between B-mode and M-mode [(21±10) compared with (31±13)×10−3/kPa respectively; P<0.0001]. Similarly, Bland–Altman analysis showed the least variability in the DC between TDI and B-mode, and there were no significant differences between the average measurements. The TDI DC also had the lowest paired difference for inter-observer variability [(−0.1±1.1)×10−3/kPa; P=not significant]. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that TDI of the carotid arteries is feasible, comparable with B-mode measurements, more robust than M-mode and less variable than the other methods.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3