Column chromatography of human small-intestinal maltase, isomaltase and invertase activities

Abstract

1. The maltase, isomaltase and invertase (sucrase) activities of solubilized mucosal preparations from human jejunum and ileum were studied with column chromatography on anion-exchange (diethylaminoethyl- and triethylaminoethyl-)cellulose and Sephadex G-200 gel. 2. On ion-exchange cellulose columns both kinds of enzyme preparations yielded two major disaccharidase peaks. The first peak contained maltase Ia (=isomaltase) and maltase Ib (=invertase). The second peak contained maltase II and maltase III. 3. On Sephadex G-200 gel columns jejunal preparations yielded the corresponding peaks as on ion-exchange columns, but the peaks appeared in the reverse order in the effluent. The ileal preparation studied yielded a single peak on gel columns, containing all the activities studied and eluted with the ‘void volume’. 4. Precipitation with ethanol did not affect the behaviour of the enzymes during ion-exchange chromatography. When gel filtration was performed after ethanol precipitation of the enzymes, however, two peaks were obtained also with the ileal preparation, and subfractionation of the invertase was obtained with both kinds of preparations. 5. The second peak from ion-exchange chromatograms, containing maltase II and maltase III, on concentration was found to have very weak isomaltase activity, probably exerted by these enzymes as such. This activity accounts for only about 1% of the total isomaltase activity of the mucosa. 6. The results support the concept of the specificity of the human small-intestinal disaccharidases previously described after heat-inactivation experiments. The subfractionation of the invertase that under certain conditions is seen on Sephadex G-200 columns appears most likely to be an artifact. Consequently the nomenclature for the human maltose-, isomaltose- and sucrose-splitting enzymes proposed by another research group after gel-filtration chromatography studies should be abandoned. It seems more logical to keep the nomenclature based on heat inactivation [maltase Ia (=isomaltase), maltase Ib (=invertase or sucrase), maltase II and maltase III] until increased knowledge about the specificity and structure of these enzymes makes possible a more rational nomenclature.