Abstract
Introduction: In the current variety of normative documentation for characterizing the impact of water pollutants from centralized water supply systems on public health, it seems relevant to consider methodological approaches to the hygienic assessment of drinking water and unify them in accordance with modern methods.
Objective: To consider methodological approaches to assessing risks posed by potable water quality in centralized water supply systems based on public health monitoring data.
Materials and methods: The authors reviewed regulatory documents on health risk assessment from chronic exposure to chemicals in tap water. An algorithm has been developed to optimize the assessment of three types of potential risk posed by chemical and organoleptic water quality indicators: carcinogenic, non-carcinogenic, and organoleptic.
Results: In the first place, we determined steps of risk assessment aimed at focusing on priority indicators and excluding those chemicals which method of determination does not allow determining the concentration or interferes with its averaging. The variability in the assessment of non-carcinogenic risk due to differences in the values of safe doses/concentrations and the procedure for calculating risk values and their interpretation was noted. A comparative description of the procedure for assessing carcinogenic risk and the classification of its levels are given. The authors present an algorithm for optimizing risk assessment related to the quality of drinking water from centralized water supply systems based on socio-hygienic monitoring data.
Conclusion: The presented algorithm, which is based on regulations with authors’ additions, involves most of the aspects that hygienists face when planning and studying the health effects of drinking water quality. It enables optimization of assessing risks of exposure to water contaminants from centralized water supply systems based on socio-hygienic monitoring data. In addition, it summarizes the ambiguous procedure for risk assessment established in the regulatory documentation, supplemented by the experience of domestic long-term studies.
Publisher
Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference29 articles.
1. National Research Council (US) Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1983. Accessed January 25, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216620/
2. Rakhmanin YA, Novikov SM, Avaliani SL, Sinitsyna OO, Shashina TA. Actual problems of environmental factors risk assessment on human health and ways to improve it. Health Risk Analysis. 2015;(2):4-11. (In Russ.)
3. Novikov SM, Fokin MV, Shashina TA, Dodina NS. Tools for Environmental Risk Assessment (TERA) – Russian information-forecasting systems, experience of application for health risk assessment. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2017;96(11):1088-1090. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-11-1088-1090
4. Dray IV, Shaydullin FN, Voetskiy IA, Zimareva SA, Kosyanov MA, Stepanova NV. [Creation and implementation of the information system “Interactive map of drinking water quality control in the Russian Federation”.] In: Popova AYu, Zaitseva NV, eds. Health Risk Analysis – 2020: Proceedings of the Tenth All-Russian Conference with international participation in conjunction with the International Meeting on Environment and Health RISE – 2020 and a Round Table on Food Safety, Perm, May 13–15, 2020. Perm: Perm National Research Polytechnic Univ. Publ.; 2020;1:284-294. (In Russ.)
5. Myasnikov IO, Novikova YuA, Kopytenkova OI, Evseeva MN, Yeremin GB. Methodological bases of the management of data collection for drinking water quality monitoring. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2021;100(8):769-774. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2021- 100-8-769-774
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献