Abstract
Introduction: The relevance of the study is determined by a great number of functioning thermal power stations that operate using solid fuels (40 %) and are a source of ambient air pollution posing human health risks.
Objective: A comparative hygienic assessment of the component, disperse, and morphological composition of fly ash and airborne particles in the area surrounding a coal-fired power station for the purpose of increasing the accuracy of human health risk assessment.
Materials and methods: We have used unified and approved methods for hygienic assessment of ambient air quality; hazard identification and health risk assessment; scanning electron microscopy and micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy of component, disperse, and morphological structure of fly ash and airborne particulate matter.
Results and discussion: Large coal-fired thermal power plants emit about 36 chemicals. Over 59 % of brown coal ash particles are calcium, magnesium, iron, silicon, aluminum, sodium, potassium, sulfur, and phosphorus compounds. Particles found in fly ash and ambient air of the surrounding area have similar components and dispersion, are predominantly less than 10 µm in diameter with the sphericity index ranging from 0.4 to 1.0. Maximum allowable concentrations (MAC) of seven chemicals are exceeded in the study area: up to 3.3 single MAC, up to 1.4 average daily MAC, and up to 1.5 average annual MAC, with the estimated contribution of the thermal power stations of about 40 %. We have also established increased non-carcinogenic health risks with the dust fractions alone generating risk levels as high as 5.5 HQac, 2.4 HQch, and 6.9 HIch, which are rated as “high” and “alerting”. Identified solid particles (aluminum, magnesium, calcium, etc.) are more significant risk factors compared to unidentified particulate matter and can cause respiratory and circulatory diseases, diseases of the eye, etc., which requires their quantification. These chemicals are not included in air emissions inventory lists and are, therefore, not monitored. As a result, health risks posed by economic activities of thermal power stations may be underestimated.
Publisher
Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous),Epidemiology
Reference32 articles.
1. Akhmetshin ER. [Impact of energy pollution of the environment on human life expectancy.] Molodoy Uchenyy. 2018;(1(187)):48-52. (In Russ.)
2. Zaitseva NV, May IV. Ambient air quality and health risks as objective indicators to estimate effectiveness of air protection in cities included into the ‘Clean air’ Federal project. Health Risk Analysis. 2023;(1):4-12. doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.01.eng
3. Netsvetaev AG. Right protection of atmosphere air from pollution according to the legislation of the Russian Federation. In: Arkhipova NI, Timofeeva SV, Knyazeva EYu, eds. Legal Security of the Individual, State and Society: Proceedings of the XIX International Scientific Conference, Moscow, April 25, 2019. Moscow: Russian State Humanitarian University Publ.; 2019:108-116. (In Russ.)
4. Rybinskaya ET. Negative impact of thermal energy on the environment in the context of the realization of the right to environmental safety. Agrarnoe i Zemel’noe Pravo. 2023;(4(220)):65-67. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47643/1815-1329_2023_4_65
5. Rakitskii VN, Avaliani SL, Novikov SM, Shashina TA, Dodina NS, Kislitsin VA. Health risk analysis related to exposure to ambuent air contamination as a component in the strategy aimed at reducing global non-infectious epidemics. Health Risk Analysis. 2019;(4):30-36. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.03.eng