The state of kidney replacement therapy in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: A call to action

Abstract

Background. South Africa (SA) is one of the most financially unequal countries in the world. This situation is highlighted by disparateaccess to healthcare, particularly provision of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Unlike the private sector, public sector access to KRT is highly rationed, and patient selection is based on suitability for transplantation and capacity.Objectives. To investigate the state of the KRT service in Eastern Cape Province, SA, by analysing access to and provision of KRT in theprovince for individuals with end-stage kidney disease, as well as disparities between the private and public healthcare systems.Methods. This was a retrospective descriptive study to examine KRT provision and temporal trends in the Eastern Cape. Data were obtained from the South African Renal Registry and the National Transplant Waiting List. KRT provision was compared between the three main referral centres, in Gqeberha (formerly Port Elizabeth), East London and Mthatha, and between the private and public healthcare systems.Results. There were 978 patients receiving KRT in the Eastern Cape, with an overall treatment rate of 146 per million population (pmp).The treatment rate for the private sector was 1 435 pmp, compared with 49 pmp in the public sector. Patients treated in the private sector were older at initiation of KRT (52 v. 34 years), and more likely to be male, to be HIV positive, and to receive haemodialysis as their KRT modality. Peritoneal dialysis was more commonly used in Gqeberha and East London as the first and subsequent KRT modality, compared with Mthatha. There were no patients from Mthatha on the transplant waiting list. There were no waitlisted HIV-positive patients in the public sector in East London, compared with 16% of the public sector patients in Gqeberha. The kidney transplant prevalence rate was 58 pmp in the private sector and 19 pmp in the public sector, with a combined prevalence of 22 pmp, constituting 14.9% of all patients on KRT. We estimated the shortfall of KRT provision in the public sector to be ~8 606 patients.Conclusion. Patients in the private sector were 29 times more likely to access KRT than their public sector counterparts, who were onaverage 18 years younger at initiation of KRT, probably reflecting selection bias in an overburdened public health system. Transplantation rates were low in both sectors, and lowest in Mthatha. A large public sector KRT provision gap exists in the Eastern Cape and needs to be addressed urgently.