Abstract
Problems arise when a lawfully appointed surrogate decision-maker wishes to decide on a course of action on behalf of a mentally incompetent patient that is against the patient’s best interests. This may arise: (i) where there is no advance directive, and the decision is made by the surrogate decision-maker on religious grounds; (ii) where the medical practitioners are of the opinion that the surrogate decision-maker’s decision is not in the best interests of the patient; (iii) where the close relatives of the patient do not agree with the decision by the surrogate decision-maker; and (iv) where the surrogate decision-maker asks the medical practitioners to undertake treatment or a procedure on the patient that is unlawful or unethical. Suggestions are made regarding what doctors should do when faced with each of these situations.
Publisher
South African Medical Association NPC
Reference29 articles.
1. South Africa. National Health Act 61 of 2003. www.gov.za/documents/national-health-act (accessed 18
2. January 2023).
3. Elder L. Why some Jehovah’s Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society
4. blood policy. J Med Ethics 2000;26:375-380. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3934270/
5. (accessed 18 January 2023).