Unpacking the legality of termination of pregnancy based on ‘social grounds’ under South African law

Author:

Khan M

Abstract

The topic of abortion was in the limelight again in Dobbs v Jackson, where the US Supreme Court overturned the decision of Roe v Wade, ‘which guaranteed women and pregnant people a constitutional right to abortion’. While not bound by the judgment, this gives us an opportunity to reflect on the current law in South Africa which regulates the termination of pregnancy. The primary piece of legislation which governs abortion is the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. Section 2 of the Act lists the grounds under which one may lawfully terminate a pregnancy. One of those grounds relates to the period of the 13th up until the 20th week of the gestation period, and states that if a medical practitioner, after consultation with the pregnant woman, is of the opinion that the continued pregnancy would significantly affect the social or economic circumstances of the woman, then the pregnancy may be lawfully terminated. The question is: What exactly is meant by ‘social grounds’? This article considers this aspect from a legal perspective and attempts to provide clarity on the issue, in the hope that this will be of assistance to medical practitioners who are concerned about the outcome of their actions, when assisting persons in this position.

Publisher

South African Medical Association NPC

Subject

Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference25 articles.

1. Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health (Reproductive Health Alliance as Amicus Curiae) 2005 (1) SA 509 (T) para 698.

2. South Africa. Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. https://www.gov. za/documents/choice-termination-pregnancy-act (accessed 2 May 2023).

3. ConstitutionoftheRepublicofSouthAfrica1996.https://www.gov.za/documents/ constitution-republic-south-africa-1996 (accessed 2 May 2023).

4. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. S12.

5. Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health case no. 7728/2000 (TPD).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3