Comparative Efficacy of Diode Laser System versus Intense Pulse Light (Ipl) In Management of Unwanted Hair

Author:

Ilyas Sara,Hussain Majid,Siddiqui Muhammad Adeel,Muzaffar Bushra,Gul Kiran,Sajjad Daniyal

Abstract

Unwanted hair growth can be caused by several factors, including genetics, systemic illness, and even drug reactions. According to the underlying medical condition, excessive hair growth was labelled as either hirsutism or hypertrichosis. Objective: To compare the efficacy of diode laser system versus intense pulse light in the management of unwanted hair among female patients. Methods: Patients in this randomized controlled study had hirsutism. Group A received powerful pulse light therapy for three sessions, one month apart, while Group B received diode laser treatment. To determine the effectiveness and side effects in both groups, patients were monitored for four months and subsequently assessed clinically.  Results: Out of these total 60 patients, intense pulse light system was more efficacious in achieving patient satisfaction (73.3%) at the end of three months as compared to diode laser (26.7%) (p value < 0.001). Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial showed that intense pulse light therapy was more efficacious in management of unwanted hair compared to diode laser therapy. 

Publisher

CrossLinks International Publishers

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3