Author:
Mudassar Palwasha,Butt Zara,Salik Sumbal,Munawar Raheel,Hamid Khizra,Yaseen Iqra,Saeed Arslan,Khalid Amna
Abstract
Tightness of cervical muscles especially upper trapezius and levator scapulae leads to the limitation of cervical ranges and develop a painful condition named as Upper cross syndrome. Objective: The aim was to determine the effect of Static Stretching along with and without Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR) in managing pain, ranges and disability among the patient with Upper Cross Syndrome. Methods: A hospital-based study was carried out following convenience sampling. Study included 22 patients of 18-50 years suffering with Upper Cross Syndrome divided into two groups. Group A (n=11) managed by Post Isometric Relaxation with Group B (n=11) through Static Stretching. Visual Analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Goniometer were used for assessment of outcomes. The data was analyzed by suing SPSS version 25.0 in which within and between group analysis were done by using parametric test with p-value< 0.05. Results: The results showed VAS and NDI were significantly improved by PIR with 2.27± 1.27 and SS was 4.00± 1.94 and post-NDI value was 24.90±2.21 and 25.09± 2.84 respectively. Similarly; the post ranges of PIR showed statistically significant results in improving cervical ranges as compared to Static stretching with p-value <0.05 Conclusions: The study concluded that combination of Static Stretching and PIR is significantly effective in improving pain, ranges and functional status among Upper cross Syndrome patient along with rapid recovery rate having p-value <0.05.
Publisher
CrossLinks International Publishers
Reference20 articles.
1. Mubashir M. A cross-sectional survey on prevalence of upper cross syndrome and its correlation to WRMSDS in working physiotherapists. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation. 2021 Mar; 10(1): 42-50. doi: 10.36283/pjr.zu.10.1/008.
2. Risalda P, Phansopkar P, Naqvi WM. Effectiveness of active release technique verses conventional physiotherapy in management of upper cross syndrome. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2021 Jan;15(1): 246-50.
3. Azam H, Fatima N, Asjad A, Ashraf I, Asif T, Rehman F. Comparative Effects of Comprehensive Corrective Exercises Versus Muscle Energy Techniques in Patients with Upper Cross Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Corrective Exercises Vs Muscle Energy Techniques in Patients with Upper Cross Syndrome. Pakistan BioMedical Journal. 2022 Jul; 5(7):173-7. doi: 10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.671.
4. Hosseini SM, Rahnama N, Barati AH. Comparing the effects of ten weeks of regular corrective exercise and corrective exercise with whole body vibration apparatus on upper cross syndrome. Studies in Sport Medicine. 2017 Jan; 8(20): 89-106.
5. Vaishnavi G, Kumar SD, Kumar GM, Kirupa K, Tharani G, Giftson TE, et al., A study to analyse the effect of Mckenzie’s method of exercise to treat upper cross syndrome associated with cervicogenic headache. Biomedicine. 2021 Dec; 41(4): 855-8. doi: 10.51248/.v41i4.499.