Comparison of Effectiveness of Mechanical Hold Versus Kinesio Taping in Managing Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Author:

Syed Sidra,Bukhari Bazal,Afzal Saba,Nasir Maham,Ali Sarwat

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common problem of runners leading to pain and functional limitation in athletes. Patellar taping is increasingly popular method of treatment for PFPS but comparative effectiveness especially McConnell's taping (MT) and Kinesio taping (KT) techniques is unknown. Objective: The intentions of this study were to find and compare effects of McConnell's taping (MT) and Kinesio taping (KT) in management of PFPS. Methods: A quasi experimental study was conducted by recruiting 60 patients of PFPS using convenience sampling technique. Participants were randomly divided into two groups MT and KT group and received patellar taping on daily basis for MT and on alternate days for KT group. Assessment was done using numeric rating pains scale and range of motion before treatment, immediately after 1st session, after 1 week and after 2 weeks of rehabilitation. After 2 weeks data was entered on SPSS v.21 and Analysis was done. Results: Mean Age in Kinesio taping (KT) was 28.40±4.74 and in McConnell's taping (MT)group was 28.17.70± 4.684. Within the group analysis showed that both techniques were effective in reducing pain intensity, improving range of motion and improving anterior knee pain scale scores (p-value < 0.05). However, independent sample t-test analysis determined that there was not any particular difference between the results of both aping techniques and p-value > 0.05 that proves our null that there is no difference between the effects of KT and MT in treating PFPS. Conclusion: KT and MT both are equally effective techniques for management of PFPS and important in decreasing pain and disability. However further studies are required with control groups to measure additional effects of exercise therapy.

Publisher

CrossLinks International Publishers

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3