Author:
Ghazanfar Mariam,Ahmad Jawad,Rafiq Shazia,Iftikhar Hussain Shahzada,Amin Tooba,Muhammad Rizwan ,Kalsoom Umme,Razzaq Ayesha
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy is a clinical condition that affects the nerve roots and is frequently brought on by inflammatory or compressive disease. Although many alternative techniques have been proposed for reducing patients' pain and disabilities, manual therapy has been proven to be an efficient method. The goal of the current study was to compare how well the Manual Cervical Traction and Natural Apophyseal Glides treated individuals with cervical radiculopathy for pain and impairment. Methods: The physiotherapy department of Mayo Hospital Lahore conducted a parallel design, randomized controlled experiment on 72 patients. Following baseline testing, participants were divided into two groups randomly. Natural apophyseal glides and baseline therapy were given to group A, whereas manual cervical traction and baseline treatment were given to group B. Three weeks of treatment were spent receiving three weekly sessions on a rotating basis. A neck disability index and a numeric pain rating scale were used for assessment at the baseline and second and third weeks of therapy. The data was examined using SPSS version 25. Results: Data was analyzed for 72 participants. Mean and standard deviation scores for pain in group A were 3.14 ± 0.601 and of group B were 3.34 ± 0.482 before treatment. The post treatment score for group A were 1.57 ± 0.502 and of group B were 1.63 ± 0.490 with P value 0.632. P value for disability was 0.11. Conclusion: Natural Apophyseal Glides is equally effective to manual cervical traction for relieving pain but found to be more effective for improving functional mobility.
Publisher
CrossLinks International Publishers
Reference28 articles.
1. 1. Maurer AJ, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Cervical Radicular Pain. Pain: Springer; 2019: 605-9.
2. 2. Hartman CJ and Hoh DJ. Pathobiology of Cervical Radiculopathy and Myelopathy. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy. Springer, Cham. 2019: 53-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97952-6_5
3. 3. Melbye M. Strategies for treatment and rehabilitation of cervical radiculopathy. Kinésithérapie, la Revue. 2018; 18(194):18. doi: 10.1016/j.kine.2017.11.028
4. 4. Rodine RJ and Vernon H. Cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review on treatment by spinal manipulation and measurement with the Neck Disability Index. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2012 Mar; 56(1):18.
5. 5. Afzal R, Ghous M, Shakil Ur Rehman S, Masood T. Comparison between Manual Traction, Manual Opening technique and Combination in Patients with cervical radiculopathy: Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2019 Sep; 69(9):1237-1241.