Quality of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) as perceived by the postgraduate residents appearing in Mid Training Assessment (MTA) during January 2022 at Rawalpindi Medical University

Author:

Shahid Rizwana,Asad Muhammad,Khalid Rabbia

Abstract

Impartiality and reliability of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) render them an ideal assessment tool for measuring higher order cognition. Objective: To determine the perception of postgraduate medical trainees pertinent to the quality of MCQs administered in Mid Training Assessment (MTA) January 2022. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among 40 postgraduate trainees who appeared in MTA during January 2022. About 23, 12 and 05 of these trainees were doing MS and MD training at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Holy Family Hospital and DHQ Hospital Rawalpindi respectively. Trainees were enrolled in the study through consecutive non-probability sampling. The feedback from the trainees about quality of MCQs was gathered by means of a structured questionnaire based on 5-point likert scale. Data analysis was done by using SPSS version 25.0. Results: About 67% of the trainees were pleased with the quality and construct of MCQ in their assessment in terms of illustration of the information in their stems needed to understand the clinical problem. More than 82% trainees satisfied with the time allocated for attempting MCQs papers. Only 55% trainees agreed with alignment of MCQs with given Table of Specification (TOS). Most (32.5%) wanted to have difficulty level of the MCQs in accordance with level of training. Around 27.5% and 22.5% of the residents proposed to incorporate more clinical reasoning and problem solving MCQs respectively. Conclusions: Trainees were substantially contented with the standard of MCQs. They suggested for inclusion of more clinical reasoning and problem-solving type questions in alignment with TOS.

Publisher

CrossLinks International Publishers

Reference25 articles.

1. 1. Abdel-Hameed AA, Al-Faris EA, Alorainy IA, Al-Rukban MO. The criteria and analysis of good multiple-choice questions in a health professional setting. Saudi Medical Journal 2005; 26910); 1505-10.

2. 2. Harper R. Multiple Choice Questions - A Reprieve. Bioscience Education 2003; 2(1): 1-6. doi.10.3108/beej.2003.02000007.

3. 3. Vegi VAK, Sudhakar PV, Bhimarasetty DM, Pamarthi K, Edara L, Kutikuppala LVS, et al. Multiple-choice questions in assessment: Perceptions of medical students from low-resource countries. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2022; 11: 103. org.4103%2Fjehp.jehp_621_21.

4. 4. Bailey PH, Mossey S, Moroso S, Cloutier JD, Love A. Implications of multiple-choice testing in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 2012; 32(6): e40-e44. doi.10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.011.

5. 5. Marsh EJ, Roediger HL, Bjorkm RA, Bjork E. The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007; 14 (2): 194-199. doi.10.3758/BF03194051.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3