Speech Patterns in Litigation Documents (Exemplified by Decrees)

Author:

Donskova Yuliia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Abstract

The study focuses on speech patterns typically used in litigation documents issued at the stage of criminal proceeding initiation and pre-trial investigation, which belong to the genre of decree. It is stated that Russian Federation Criminal Procedure Code and most of the Comments to it lack any language requirements to the text organization in these litigation documents. The article is aimed at defining characteristics of the decree genre structure; in particular, lexical and grammatical means that are used in decree texts are equated to the language norms. Some most frequent cases of lexical compatibility violation within set expressions and cliché of litigation documents and their combinations are detected. The author adheres to the opinion that language norms violations may have legal consequences in qualifying offenses and their types. The analysis of syntactic structure of sentences reveals that there is no distinction in the linguistic category of event completeness, in the texts they are presented as hypothetical events. Several aspects of modality in decree texts are studied. The author lays down some requirements on composing a narrative part of the decree as a forensic genre, makes an assertion that it is time to formulate some firm linguistic criteria of decree documentation organization and indicate the consent on expediency of linguistic expertize.

Publisher

Volgograd State University

Reference17 articles.

1. Apresyan Yu.D., 1995. Problema faktivnosti «znat’» i ego sinonimy [The problem of factivity: Russian ZNATJ ‘to know’ and its synonyms]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, iss. 4, pp. 43-63.

2. Glazkov A.V., 2016. Aktualnost soderzhaniya tekstov: teksty neaktualnogo soderzhaniya [Actuality of the text content: texts of nonactual content]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [The science of person: Humanitarian Researches], no 3 (25), p. 52-58. DOI 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2016.25.52.

3. Gulakova I.I., Chaplygin V.N., 2015. K voprosu o rechevoy kulture sledovatelya pri sostavlenii processualnykh dokumentov [On the question of the speech culture of the investigator in the preparation of procedural documents]. Ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie problemy borby s prestupnostyu: Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Criminal procedure and forensic problems of combating crime: All-Russian scientific-practical conf.]. Orel, OrYUI MVD of Russia named after V.V. Lukyanova, p. 139-143.

4. Yegorova E.N., 2016. Yazyk sudebnogo dokumenta: uzus i kodifikatsiya. [Language of judicial document: the usage and codification]. Simbirskiy nauchnyy vestnik [Simbirsk Scientific Journal Vestnik], no 4 (26), pp. 120-126.

5. Zaitseva I.D., 2010. Postanovlenie kak rechevoy zhanr [Resolution as a speech genre]. Filologiya i chelovek [Philology and person], no. 3, pp. 142-149.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3