Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Ex-Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Margin Assessment in Basal Cell Carcinoma Excision

Author:

Michelini Simone1,Mandel Victor Desmond2,Ardigò Marco2,Ciardo Silvana3,Cota Carlo2,Cesinaro Anna Maria4,Rossi Elena5,Ferrari Barbara5,Kaleci Shaniko5,Di Fraia Marco1,Chello Camilla1,Cantisani Carmen1,Trovato Federica1,Longo Caterina5,Pellacani Giovanni1

Affiliation:

1. Dermatologic Unit, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

2. Porphyria and Rare Diseases Unit, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute - IRCCS, Rome, Italy

3. Dermatology Clinic, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

4. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, Italy

5. Dermatology Unit, Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: Recent developments of noninvasive, high-resolution imaging techniques, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have enhanced skin cancer detection and precise tumor excision particularly in highly aggressive and poorly defined basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) Objectives: The aim of this pilot study is to assess feasibility and reproducibility of a systematic clinical workflow combining noninvasive (RCM-OCT) and invasive fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging modalities in pre- and intra-surgical evaluations of lateral and deep margins of BCC. Methods: Superficial incisions were made 2 mm beyond the clinical-dermoscopic BCC margins. Lateral margins were then explored with OCT and RCM. In positive margins, a further cut was made 2 mm distal from the previous. A final RCM/OCT-based double-negative margin was drawn around the entire perimeter of the lesion before referring to surgery. The freshly excised specimen was then examined with FCM (ex-vivo) for the evaluation of the deep margin. Histopathologic examination eventually confirmed margin involvement. Results: The study included 22 lesions from 13 patients. At the end of the study, 146 margins—106 negative (73%) and 40 positive (27%) at RCM/OCT—were collected. RCM/OCT margin evaluation showed an overall sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 96.3%. The overall positive margins diagnostic accuracy was 98.2%. Reproducibility was evaluated on recorded images and the raters showed a substantial inter-observer agreement on both RCM (κ =0.752) and OCT images (κ =0.724). Conclusions: The combined RCM/OCT/FCM ex-vivo approach noninvasively facilitates the presurgical and intrasurgical lateral and deep margin assessment of poorly defined BCCs.

Publisher

Mattioli1885

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3